• 1 Post
  • 142 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 30th, 2025

help-circle
  • Omg the comments are so out of hand. I regularly do code reviews on colleagues who use AI to write code (some whilst protesting, but still). The comments are usually the worst part.

    The thing writes entire novels in the summary that do nothing but confuse and add cognitive load. It adds comments to super obvious things, describing what the code does instead of why. Yes AI I can read code, I know assigning a variable a value is how shit works. And I have still got PTSD from those kinds of comments from a legacy system I worked on for years that did the exact same, except the comments and the code didn’t match up, so it was a continuous guess which one was the intended one. It also likes to put responses to the prompt in the comments. So for example when it assigned A to a variable and it was supposed to be B, when you point this out it adds a comment saying something like: This is supposed to be B not A. But when you read those comments after the fact, it makes zero sense. Like of course it should be B? Why should it ever be A?

    And it often generates a bunch of markdown docs which are plain drivel, luckily most devs just delete those before I see them.

    My personal experience is in 30% of cases the AI is just plain wrong and the result is nonsense, delete that shit and try again. In the 70% that does have some kind of answer there is ALWAYS at least one big issue and usually multiple. It’s a 50/50 if the code is workable with some kinks to work out, or if it is seriously flawed and needs a lot of work. For experienced devs it can be a helpful thing if they have writers block, to give them something to be angry about, showing them how they can do better. But for inexperienced devs it’s just plain terrible, the code is shit and the dev doesn’t even know. And worse still the dev doesn’t learn. I try to sit down with them, explain the shortcomings and how to do better. But they don’t learn, they just know what stuff to write in the prompt, in order to not get me on their case. Or they will say stuff like: but it works right? Facepalm

    That company I do work for also tried getting their sysadmins and devops people to use AI. Till one day there was a permissions issue, which admittedly was pretty complicated, where they ended up solving it with AI. The team was happy, the upper management was happy, high fives all around. Till the grumpy old sysadmin who has 40 years of experience takes a look and hits the big ol’ red alarm button of doom. Full investigation later, the AI had fucked up and created a huge hole in the security. There was zero evidence it had been exploited, but that doesn’t matter. All the work still needed to be done, all the paperwork filed, proper agencies informed, because the security issue was there. Management eased up on AI usage for those people real fast.

    It’s so weird how people in charge want to use AI, but aren’t even really sure of what it is and what it isn’t. And they don’t listen to what the people with actual knowledge have to say. In their minds we are probably all just covering our asses to not be out of a job.

    But for real if anyone in management is listening, take it from an old asshole who has done this job since the 80s: AI fucking sucks!












  • You are probably a prosumer, somebody who knows their stuff and doesn’t want an inferior experience like on a tablet, console or notebook. Something upgradable, to invest in and use for many years. That market will certainly exist, but prices will be much higher than they are today.

    I remember back in the day when I bought my 40MB hard drive it was around $3000 in todays money. I had to really save up to get that thing. I labelled the partition “LARGE” because my mind was blown at 40 whole megabytes of storage.

    No idea where we are headed, it’s pretty uncertain at this point.


  • I think we might be seeing the end of consumer desktop computers coming to pass. The market will split into phones and tablet, which most people use for most things traditionally a computer would be used for. Laptops are widely used for more work like stuff. Thin clients connecting to virtual desktops is already the norm in a lot of companies. Desktop computers might go back to where they were in the 80s and early 90s, very expensive high end prosumer equipment. Only for real enthusiasts, who see it as a hobby and want to invest heavily, or professionals that need the local compute power of a workstation. The computer industry was already in big trouble just before covid, then we suddenly all needed work from home setups or spent more time at home so wanted a new better computer, which caused the industry to pick back up. This AI bubble might just kill it finally, with prices skyrocketing, people will be hesitant to buy new hardware for a while.


  • This is mostly correct. It’s also the case that “dreams” are formed after you wake up. You aren’t dreaming while you are asleep, your brain is firing random shit that makes no sense. As soon as you start to wake it tries to piece together what the fuck was going on into something resembling a narrative. This piecing together is part of the waking up and not a part of the sleeping. This is why you can have a dream about an alarm going of for seemingly tens of minutes or even hours, while you are being woken up by your alarm going off. Your alarm probably hasn’t been going for more than a few seconds, but your brain incorporates it into the narrative. Now this isn’t to say you can’t have a bad dream or nightmare and be woken up by them. The random firing can definitely cause enough stress to wake you up. Especially if you are ill (fever dreams) or under a lot of stress in general, your brain can misbehave during sleep and wake you up. It’s just that the “story” part of the dream only happens when you wake up, while you are sleeping it is random.


  • And their products are so fucking shit. Today I wanted to shit post in a Discord server I’m a part of. I felt like if I put effort into it, it wouldn’t really be a shit post any more. The idea was minimum effort for a few laughs and we move on. So I loaded up ChatGPT and asked it to generate the meme image. I thought even if it messed up the text, I would just generate it without the text and put the text in with gimp or something.

    I put in the prompt, it spewed a lot of nonsense about what I meant and how it was going to generate the image. If I would just say “Generate it”, it would generate the image. So I did, it then said I needed to be signed in for image generation. OK fine, I signed in with a Gmail account I only ever use for spam, just for occasions such as this. It was happy to start generating.

    It hung on generating for a while, until it said done in the status thing top right, but nothing in the chat. I refreshed the page, which gave me the option to prompt again. I asked where is the generated image? It said here it is and presented a gray box. It said if you see a gray box you uploaded it wrong? Wtf are you talking about? I didn’t upload anything. It said it could try generating again. Same exact result, crashing on generation, refresh yielding a new different gray box.

    Like for fucks sake, the one thing I thought it would be good at, low effort shitposting, it failed at. Why the fuck does this company have such a large market cap?

    I can’t wait for this whole AI debacle to be over and done with. Nobody is ever going to pay for your buggy ass bullshit generator.




  • Thorry@feddit.orgtoWitchy Memes@lemmy.worldYep
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    Yeah I’ve have had encounters people who were super anti-chemicals, it had to be all natural all the time. Not only are they ignoring that literally every thing ever is made of chemicals and just because it’s natural, doesn’t mean it’s good for you. But these people also had all of those granny says recipes to do all sorts of stuff, like in the olden days we had this secret knowledge to for example clean stuff, all without any chemicals. Most of these recipes involved stuff like baking soda or vinegar for example, like bitch please you are literally doing chemistry.


  • Think of it this way:

    If I ask you can a car fly? You might say well if you put wings on it or a rocket engine or something, maybe? OK, I say, so I point at a car on the street and ask: Do you think that specific car can fly? You will probably say no.

    Why? Even though you might not fully understand how a car works and all the parts that go into it, you can easily tell it does not have any of the things it needs to fly.

    It’s the same with an LLM. We know what kinds of things are needed for true intelligence and we can easily tell the LLM does not have the parts required. So an LLM alone can never ever lead to AGI, more parts are needed. Even though we might not fully understand how the internals of an LLM function in specific cases and might also not know what parts exactly are needed for intelligence or how those work.

    A full understanding of all parts isn’t required to discern large scale capabilities.