subversive_dev

This was mentioned in the write-up, the password manager didn’t autofill, but he was too out of it to notice at first

I think the main reason is because the vast majority of Lemmings are former Redditors so Lemmy is popular where Reddit is popular

Because some accounts like to spam on certain hashtags, I had the best results with muting an account the second I thought it was annoying. It’s nothing personal, I just don’t want to see their posts on my timeline anymore, which is what mute accomplishes

DJT is the 47th US president

The website at least is real, appears they won: https://u-pass.ucsd.edu/vote

the autism

I wonder how many non-white, non-european women have endured this same treatment without a sound from the media

My speculations:

• “insecure from the start” - as in , the wallet was never that “cold”

• with that amount of money, it’s easy to imagine an “insider threat”

• the hackers could have gotten lucky and struck right when the company was doing legitimate operations on the wallet

• but probably it’s a towering mountain of incompetence, composed of the elements above and more

What’s the cure?

I’m sure the feckless controlled opposition party will jump right on this, just you wait

Hard to say right now. The article suggests that the banks are just trying to free up cash on their balance sheets. However, this could instead be an indication that they are looking for a “bigger fool” to take the losses. I personally think the bottom won’t fall out of Xitter until the tesla share price crashes. Elon bought some time with credulous fools with the ridiculous cybercab demo, but that can’t last forever. At that point I think the only question is whether SpaceX gets pulled down with all the rest of the musk ventures

Yes they mean don’t break the law for your boss because the second anyone starts asking questions they will be extremely happy to have a scapegoat.

Instead, insist that the request be put in writing

We…uhhh… suspect Russian involvement

removed by mod

When she stares in the camera without speaking like “you can’t believe this guy either, right?”

Ahhh, of course, we are going to reach for the “Anti-Zionism = Anti- Semitism” defense. For the record, I make common cause with any Jewish people who oppose colonialism and genocide, like these honest and noble folks: https://www.jewishvoiceforpeace.org/

Interesting, I wonder what happened immediately before the state of Israel declared Independence? Funny how you and the other occupiers never want to talk about the Nakba. Funny how you want to talk about declaring independence but not about displacing hundreds of thousands and destroying or colonizing hundreds of villages and towns.

How about this: return all the land that was taken in the Nakba, then we can stop talking about the destruction of the occupier state. Is that civil and fair enough for you? Or was it always about stealing the land from the beginning?

I don’t really give a shit if resistance fighters check all the right civility boxes. The occupiers were already given most of the land in 1949, but that just wasn’t enough. Fuck genocidal setters. Fuck false equivalence. Fuck apartheid. The PLO has played the civility game all these years, how has that worked out for them? Israel is an evil and corrupt society (the US is too).

assault with intent to annihilate

So we’re just making up serious sounding phrases to try and balance the scales? Which side is bulldozing houses and stealing land? Which side is practicing brutal apartheid? Which side FUCKING BOMBS SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS?

Jesus fucking Christ get outside of your media bubble every once in awhile.

I suspect that you can’t because you have built a comfortable occupier existence for yourself, so you can’t look at the pile of bodies forming the foundation of your existence.

Now it seems we’ve reached a “verbal argument” where it’s just an argument over definitions, which I’m not interested in.

This is where I’m personally going to leave this:

Some people see the 70 -year genocide of the Palestinians as an unspeakable atrocity that plainly justifies violent and non-violent resistance.

Some people want to center the fears of the occupiers in the discussion, and use that to throw up their hands and shut down any action or solution that isn’t on the occupiers’ terms.

Again, this is an essential distinction. States are not peoples. A national group is the people of a state, not the state itself.

The axis states ceased to exist after world war II. Despite gratuitous bombing by allied forces, the peoples of the states continue to exist, and largely inhabit the same territory.

Seemingly by your argument, land can be seized, people expelled, war crimes committed, but if you have created a state, it would be inherently wrong to dislodge you. I personally don’t regard states as a magic blanket that rules out decolonization by definition.