Venus [she/her]

They didn’t say “I can’t use the railway” they said “the railway doesn’t run to [place the railway definitely runs to]”

But the person in the original comment is wrong. “The software and driver support isn’t there” means that appropriate software does not exist. If they were being honest they would have said “Ableton doesn’t support Linux and I want to stick with Ableton so it doesn’t work for me.” Their inaccurate comment could discourage people who do not have a strong preference toward Ableton from trying Linux.

All I know is that everybody says retirement homes are full of horny old people fucking all the time so maybe? Either that or old people just don’t care as much about attraction and are just happy all the parts still work

My guess is as an adult you’ll always be attracted to women around the 25-35 range most but maybe once you get old you’ll also find some stuff to appreciate in grannies

Probably not, but it’s also shorthand for something everybody understands, even the bazinga-brained, so it’s not hard to clarify

Yeah I honestly think they’d just reinvent the cow.

It’s an understandable answer that kind of misses the point. Cows are an incredible strain on the environment because of how fucking many of them humans breed in order to abuse and murder. But deleting cows would just prompt people to breed and abuse a different animal so it wouldn’t help that much

Lmao look at this fucking bootlicker

utorrent
piratebay

There are a million good programs and services out there, why use the ones that are completely shit in every way

I haven’t yet seen evidence they wouldn’t.

I just don’t know if I believe that their culture has exactly one garment considered modest.

That seems like a very disingenuous framing. Khaki pants are no more or less modest than jeans. A rule saying “don’t wear this specific article of clothing” is not a rule against dressing modestly, and I’m certain that there are plenty of modestly dressed children of all sorts of cultures at all these schools.

Sincere question. Obviously France is racist as fuck and instituting (or enforcing, whichever) policies in a racist way. But I’m seeing a lot of people saying that these outfits being banned are not actually religious at all, and are only culturally popular within the cultures of the people being targeted. If that’s the case, why are they still coming to school wearing them? If I were a kid and the government suddenly decided I’m not allowed to wear blue jeans to school, I’d wear khaki pants and then meet up with my friends and say “wtf is the deal with this new policy”

If they’re just clothes and not religious garb, why are kids still wearing them to schools which don’t allow them?

Actually, stealing from a corporation is always good under all circumstances. Everything they have is obtained by theft.

If you can’t behave civilly with another person you have no business swinging a sword at them. You should protest the event hosting them if you feel so strongly about it. You certainly shouldn’t be participating in the event. If you decide to show up and compete against the other person you’re already past all that, and now you need to behave civilly with them.

The point is, sure, there are people who don’t deserve respect. But respect is a necessary prerequisite for this kind of competition. If you can’t respect your opponent you shouldn’t be competing against them. You can’t disrespect them and also compete against them, you pick one or the other.

When did this russian fencer invade any countries or kill anyone

Only one side threw a tantrum over matters of basic courtesy in the competition over nationalism.

In other words, “whataboutism”

Did she think some random fencer was responsible for a war? Nationalists are so fucking insufferable

You have no idea what you’re talking about

Because queer is a slur many of us have been called by bigots