• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 6th, 2023

help-circle
rss






  • I’m adjacent to this problem, so I have a little context, but am not an expert at all.

    To my knowledge, we don’t have granular control over panels. So we can shut off legs of a plant, but that’s a lot of power to be moving all at once.

    Instead, prices are set to encourage commercial customers to intake more power incrementally. This has a smoother result on the grid, less chance of destabilizing.

    A customer like a data center could wait to perform defragmentation or a backup or something until the price of power hits a cheap or negative number.





  • I like nuclear and all, but I don’t think nuclear can fill the same spot as peaker plants. Nuclear usually fills the base load needs on the grid. I don’t believe there’s nuclear with ramp rates capable of competing with a peaking gas turbine.

    Energy storage does fill this gap usually. My ideal grid would be a semi-flexible nuclear baseload (+ some ancillary services), renewable “mid-load,” and energy storage peaking (+frequency response, etc.).