This is an interesting idea:

The “at least one” in the prompt is deliberately aggressive, and seems likely to force hallucinations in case an article is definitely error-free. So, while the sample here (running the prompt only once against a small set of articles) would still be too small for it, it might be interesting to investigate using this prompt to produce a kind of article quality metric: If it repeatedly results only in invalid error findings (i.e. what a human reviewer  Disagrees with), that should indicate that the article is less likely to contain factual errors

How would you describe it?

Maybe it depends what you’re fishing for. Seems true to me. It also seems like they jump more in the rain.

I somehow never considered that there were literal flagships.

I see you’ve also purchased a new scratching post

Is the project current? I see an archived repository.

AFAIK it’s on github and turns any image into obama

what are those

Full body blow dryer

I was not justifying his actions, I was offering possible explanation. I was also not evaluating/grading him or his actions.

I think his behaviour sort of makes sense if you consider how scary it could be for him (bear with me).

He’s clearly in the wrong. He knows it. Especially in the court of public opinion; he hit a kid, walking to school. It’s broad daylight and it happened at a crosswalk. It’s not looking good.

Surely, then, it can’t be his fault. Taking responsibility is not an option, it doesn’t even cross his mind. If he lashes out, if he berates the person he hit for doing something wrong, maybe he can convince himself it wasn’t his fault. Maybe he can convince the girl or the bystanders that it wasn’t his fault.

I think this is also why people can be so opposed to bike lanes or other infrastructure that promotes mixed use of roads. When most things are built with only cars in mind, it’s easier to blame a pedestrian or cyclist because they seem to be guests in a space for cars.

I sort of assumed this was common. If its not, that explains how some people can watch AFV or boxing and not feel the icky tingles and nausea.

Talk about butterfly effect lol. I wonder where we would be today if antibiotics were readily available before plagues became plagues.

Go to jail

Makes sense, thanks!

Limits still are not intuitive to me. Whats the distinction here?

I think there are worse greens

Whats that about frogs?

In some cases, downplaying the ethos can be done while emphasizing pathos, for example as William Jennings Bryan did in his Cross of Gold speech:

I would be presumptuous, indeed, to present myself against the distinguished gentlemen to whom you have listened if this were but a measuring of ability; but this is not a contest among persons. The humblest citizen in all the land when clad in the armor of a righteous cause is stronger than all the whole hosts of error that they can bring. I come to speak to you in defense of a cause as holy as the cause of liberty—the cause of humanity.

— William Jennings Bryan

what ones?