I understand balancing trade deficit is improtant, but the way to fix a mole on your feet is not by shooting it.

No, but this is the art of the deal™

(/s in case any dumbass is reading this. There is no art and he made no deal, except the deal with his criminal friend to do insider trading)

I perfer him to die from the bullet of his own in a bunker (or natural causes after creating a great recession), so that people can stop worshiping toxicity and learn from the mistakes.

If there is no Hoover, there probably will never be a Roosevelt and the new deal.

You don’t understand, all the US demand will filled in by US supply when there is no supply, demand, and economy in the U.S. :)

Yes, and journalist soilders, UN shelter soilders, and the humanitarian aid workers from World Central Kitchen from U.S., U.K., and Australia, believe it or not, also hamas soldiers.

“sale of 1,000 Gold Cards this week, raising $5 billion in a single day.”

Good for you, even if the number is true (it is not) and these keep selling (they won’t), we just need a year and a half to make back the 2.5 trillion stock market lost overnight; and 6 whole years to make back 11 trillion lost since he took the office.

BTW, I cannot it has only been less than 3 month. Feels like years have passed.

Children are not soilders. I don’t think anyone is criticising israel for killing hamas leader or soilders, especially given that hamas is a terrist organization, and Isreal is provoked; but bombing hospital, killing children, journalists, and destroying UN shelters are not okay.

Whether terrorist attack justify a full scale invasion might be debatable, but sabotaging humanitarian effort, killing children and non-combative unit is not.

No, trans girl does it better :)

Imagine they go into building trains and tracks!

And people still thinks he is playing some sort of 4D chess. My friend in Georgia mentioned that people around her says Trump is creating a dip, so that federal reserve will lower interest rate.

Yes, because president can fire tons fedral workers, can send secret police to abduct people, but cannot control the federal reserve, and have to play stagnation or bust.

Imagine if you criticize Biden then you get abuducted on the street and throw into a prison for months, then a foreign prison for god knows how long, and finally your ancestral land (unless you are a native American).

I know that is not a country I want to contribute to, but from this comment, you seem to enjoy that.

I don’t know though. CCP certainly love their alt-right cousins, and they probably spent and will continue to spend a huge amount of money to get them elected in the western world.

Given CCP more data and means to produce such influence might not be the best of ideas.

Both of them are beyond excellent from a story telling and visual prospective: highly entertaining, motivating, and fun.

However the “physicists will stop talking to you” bit just comes from the fact that professionals typically prefer rigorous discussions to handwaving; as handwaving will sometimes leads to reasonable, yet completely nonsensical results. And over-fantasization of a topic can cause student burnouts quite quickly, when they discovered the field is completely different from what they imagined. Finally many physicist just don’t enjoy string theory. String theory describes a universe that is fundamentally different from ours, and they just keeps making up more math to fix unrealized predictions; Feynman famously puts it: “string theorists don’t make predictions, they make excuses.”

But certainly my bits are exaggerating the tension between profession scientists and pop science. Many physicist do enjoy the presentation of Greene.

In general, I think the Brain Greene do benefit both the field physics and the general public, by bringing many talented students to physics. And I believe many teachers and professors can learn a lot about storytelling and visualization from pop sciences.

Brian Greene - “Elegant Universe”. This is the typical illustration of general relativity.

Brian Greene documentaries were really addictive for the high-school me. But be careful, if you watch too much of them, your physics friends will stop talking to you.

I certainly didn’t have proficient english after I graduated college 🥲…

Thank you, many of your point is very valid, I might not have made every point in my original comments sufficiently clear.

So I would imagine most folks considering this aren’t starting from zero with English skills.

As most language learner might know, professional fluency is far from “not zero”. I have near perfect mark in English for my high school entrance exam in China.

Yet, I spent almost all of my three years of high school to learn English, to be accepted by a U.S. college. And I only started writing decent professional English couple years after I graduated.

I am certainly not the most talented language learner, but I believe achieve fluent professional English not a goal that can be easily achieved in a year, especially with a 9-5 job.

Besides the money point, this is true of any emigration, yet millions do it from countries around the world.

You are right, this is also why a large majority of person do not immigrate. I am certainly not suggesting people do not immigrate. I just think that there are many realistic barrier to immigration, to Chinese and to people from other countries as well.

Many people vowed to immigrate if Trump is elected in 2016, yet many failed to do so. I imagine the real barrier to immigration might play a role in these decisions.

Are you saying the CCP has been revoking passports at this new scale and against the same targets for the same reasons for at least a decade?

No, I am saying public worker needing to submit passport is not new. Here are some Chinese source:

• https://www.zhihu.com/question/582316284
• https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_26669534
• https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/487193115

I am not saying that they are not expanding the scale of the program.

Because of the language barrier, people typically needs years of preparation to leave the country. Imagine finding a H1B job with zero connection in the U.S. and subpar English, that is literally impossible.

Even said person are willing to pay the high tuition fee in U.S. or Europe, it would take a Chinese at least a year of intense language learning to achieve reasonable fluency in a language, that is acceptable in universities.

Not to mention, leaving China also means leaving everything they know behind, friends, family, way of life, and especially money, like the other post suggests.

In fact, confiscating public workers’ passport has been practiced for at least a decade; partly for control, partly for security. And that did not spark mass exodus, slightly expanding the program likely will not change much as well.

Finally, most people in China choose public work for job security, hence they are usually averse to change. These crowds are the least likely to react to policies like this.

I think a even better solution might be to not unnecessarily waste energies 😉