What about drones? (The latex kind)
- 12 Posts
- 284 Comments
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Risa@startrek.website•anyone else agree this episode had no right to be as scary at it wasEnglish
2·1 年前After all, she did detransition an enby and force it to become a heterosexual woman through conversion therapy and surgical modification.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•What "unique" or single-game-genre games have you enjoyed?English
4·1 年前Terra Nil. It’s an anti city builder. Land in a polluted wasteland, clean the soil, plant seeds, set up ecosystems, make sure they can persist without you, and recycle all your structures before you leave. Appreciate the beauty of the natural ecosystem you restored as you fly away.
I want more games like this.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•What "unique" or single-game-genre games have you enjoyed?English
1·1 年前Antichamber is the game like Portal
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•What "unique" or single-game-genre games have you enjoyed?English
1·1 年前Outer Wilds spoiler
Deathloop is the same genre
The SJWs aren’t the ones abstaining, it’s the centrists on lemmy.ml
I don’t use he/him. Stop misgendering me.
I am indeed DroneRights, and I believe I was banned unfairly. I made an appeal here: https://lemm.ee/post/18862720, but never received any follow-up from the Beehaw admins.
Wow, obsessed with me much?
Mods, this user is an alt-right troll. Ban him. Here he is repeatedly saying xenogenders are a mental illness.
https://startrek.website/comment/8362309
https://startrek.website/comment/8466225

Also n*rcissist is 100% a slur don’t call me that.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteOPto
Warframe@dormi.zone•I blame the Republican Party for the current state of WarframeEnglish
2·1 年前It’s a joke, mate
Oh I get it now. I also misread it as new war
Well we write 12 like this: 10
It’s easy
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•Analysts: PS5 Outsold Xbox Almost 5 To 1 This Past QuarterEnglish
3·2 年前Well the last one was One so this one must be Two
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
AI Generated Images@sh.itjust.works•Tiny question. What are ai haters called?English
1·2 年前Yeah that’s the way it was before their job was automated. But now you don’t need them to work.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Cool Guides@lemmy.ca•A cool guide My girlfriend created a helpful infographic for her brother, who struggles with housekeeping.English
1·2 年前Just because you don’t remember being told common sense facts, doesn’t mean you weren’t. It probably happened at some random time without you making much of it, you just incorporated it seamlessly into your worldview. Now you look down on others for needing the same support you did when you were a child.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
AI Generated Images@sh.itjust.works•Tiny question. What are ai haters called?English
1·2 年前I’m a soulist. Soulists are always saying things like that. It’s the best version of leftism.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Technology@beehaw.org•Self-balancing commuter pods ride old railway lines on demandEnglish
10·2 年前These pods are only used on rails with very low ridership. They would switch to a train if ridership increased.
Look at it this way: you can have a train that has a capacity of 100 people, but it only runs once a day due to the low demand, and only 2 people want to ride it at that time of day…Or you can have 10 pods, which do not require as much railway maintenance, and they can carry the 10 people who actually want to use this railway, completely on demand.
Yeah, a train is better if you want to move ten thousand people a day at peak hour. But this is a cheaper way to move ten people at different times across a day. And it’s a cheaper way of inducing the demand that would justify the more efficient kind of expansion.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
AI Generated Images@sh.itjust.works•Tiny question. What are ai haters called?English
15·2 年前Proud luddite here. The original luddites destroyed machinery owned by capitalists which threatened their jobs. The choice was either destroy the machines, or stand by and become unable to feed your family while a rich man gets richer.
I have no opposition to technology which is used for good, and whose control is placed in the hands of the workers. Your self-hosted AIs are fine, although I do ask that you only use energy intensive processes if you have solar panels. After all, this planet is the only one we’ve got. At our current rate of pollution, soon the world will only be inhabitable to AI.
But I downvote anything promoting corporate AI designed to replace people’s jobs. I am all for replacing human jobs, if the humans get to relax and live comfortable lives afterward. But I am against replacing jobs if we choose to have a society where you need a job to live. That’s not nature, it’s a choice we make as a society. The minute you automate someone’s job, you do necessarily admit that society doesn’t need that person’s work to get by. The only reason they shouldn’t get to put their feet up and take it easy is political. And politically, we have decided instead what happens is they die. That’s unacceptable, and until it changes, we can’t afford to have job replacing machines.



The ability to create dispassionate political systems is, in nature, a uniquely human ability. Wolves and ants have political systems, but the systems rely on direct and intentional involvement, at least as much as anything an ant does can be intentional.
Ants don’t have recessions, or gas chambers, or nuclear bombs, or greenhouse gas pollution, or strip mining, or seafloor dragging. That’s a human invention.