Women in general have a fine line to walk to be successful. They either come off bitchy, or docile, or underhanded. We rarely say these things about men. It’s a both sides of it cause this - women are held to a higher standard, and we feed into it
- 0 Posts
- 18 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
No we didn’t
Depends on the perception. If people see the company as weird or wasteful, it can hurt the company. Think of all the negative press companies get. It’s not rational, but it exists and companies fight to minimize those sort of things.
Breaking those types of leases and selling those types of buildings off or not trivial. They will need to figure out a way to ease out of the market, but until then, this is the way they rationalize it
Don’t insult melted ice cream
Jeff bezos owns 9.5%, then to institutions under vanguard each owned 6%. He’s probably still influential-based on his prior position as CEO, but he can’t force a decision that the rest of the board wants.
He doesn’t run Amazon anymore.
Are you against using a single letter variable like e for element in iterating over things?
And lets you easily write metal languages due to the way you can pass around blocks. Think configuration as code type stuff.
This makes me want to write a function for you to add to numbers where the variables are leftumber and rightnumber, instead of x and y.
A quick Google on why. There’s lots of similar sources.
It’s a lifelong title.
The problem is risk. A lot of the bureaucracy that exists for any company is risk mitigation. The wiping of servers, or using suction cups, or any of that is a security against a large dollar amount to spend if something goes wrong. But that’s just the cost of security, it’s worthless if it isn’t tested. If a locked door isn’t rattled or deter someone, it might as well have been unlocked.
He took a gamble and the doors were not rattled and everything worked. The thing to criticize here is really the carelessness. What if one of those servers got out and somebody stole all of that data? What if while under those floorboards he got damaged, or something related did? And it’s not just these two questions, there’s stuff in that article that probably wasn’t covered that we can question.
There may be things that are not in the book that we can question, and that is the problem with Elon. He needs a string of bad luck to show how truly dangerous he is.
Elon is a Trump level business leader 🙄
People who make decisions like this don’t know what a sitemap is. They probably think CNET is an app.
I don’t know about that – if they have any good tech leadership, it’d combat that type of thinking. Hopefully.
They could have taken those articles out of the sitemap and get the same results.
They upgraded 5 days ago – unless upgrades to automatic posts to a community…
Endowments are ear marked. You don’t always get a blank cheque. It may have obligations tied to them.