I think it’s because it’s an unapologetic vertical mouse. Most others are just slanted mice. Note that the furst couple days might be slow because you have to adjust to using your arm that way. I got this one in uni because my wrist just didn’t like being flat, and I used computers a lot. This one matches my resting position really well, and the wrist rest means I’m not sliding the side of my hand all over the desk.

I think the one exception is their money, you definitely need some basic math to use it.

I have a couple of these and like them: https://www.amazon.com/J-Tech-Digital-V628-Adjustable-Sensitivity/dp/B0759V6FZC

On the contrary, there is a lot of professional software that doesn’t run on Windows!

Gross or net?

… battery heaters and block heaters are a thing for ICE too though?

For the people / businesses who book these flights.

FYI: there is actually an XKCD font if you want to match the original more closely. https://github.com/ipython/xkcd-font

deleted by creator

It takes a while to gather the data, new areas all the time.

If that’s so, where are the nuclear doms?

No, the plant is full of primary batteries! 4.2 million AA cells!

Right. I mean, macs used to be the bees’ knees.

Who needs TurboTax when gnucash exists? :)

Onshape is pretty close.

Hey, mprime runs on linux (prime95)

Yeah, a cement truck is like 45,000 lbs of concrete, which is .002%. Apparently .06% will delay setting by 90 minutes, so it’s more like 30 pounds?

I’m surprised no one has mentioned Piwigo yet.

Also, starting in 2018 Google no longer actually searches for the words you entered. Instead, it tries to figure out “what you really mean” and shows results for that. See BERT

Ah, perhaps my source was off. Thanks for the additional data.

But looking at it another way, nuclear is less than twice coal. Estimating the cost of that georgia plant would put it at $16-17B, so those overruns would be atypical.

But my main point on cost is that government investment has been lacking in nuclear compared to renewables: https://www.forbes.com/sites/robertbryce/2021/12/27/why-is-solar-energy-getting-250-times-more-in-federal-tax-credits-than-nuclear/?sh=4a783c3221cf

Without investment, it’s going to stay just as expensive. And the main regulating body not having a mandate to develop the technology has just been holding us back.