

Why NextDNS if you already query DNS through Mullvad?
Why NextDNS if you already query DNS through Mullvad?
Nope, read the Bitcoin white paper. But that was an old coin with some issues that are clear in hindsight and have been fixed in prkvscy coins like zcash & monero.
Lol if you want privacy but not crypto, you’re in for a bad time
Someone hasn’t watched many gore videos
What’s wrong with the Arch workbench in FreeCAD?
Probably because a phone number isn’t required!?
God the narrative of Business Insider is gross.
The only thing making SO decline is that they have a CEO. And that CEO is trying to “compete”.
Just keep being a great platform for Q&A and stop chasing profits. People prefer SO because the ansewrds are trustworthy. LLMs will always bullshit you and never be better than a platform free of AI crap.
You literally missed the definition of end-to-end encryption.
If Meta can see the messages, then that’s not e2ee
For me, it’s identity theft.
People need to stop calling these things cryptocurrency. They have almost none of the properties of cryptocurrencies, such as premissionless transactions and pseudonymous wallets
Matrix can’t be forced to put backdoors into their software because they are not s company. Signal can.
Pick 4 NGOs per year. Donate 10% of income at the end of the year to them evenly.
Next year pick another 4 NGOs that you think did great work that year.
Turkey had previously spent months blocking Sweden’s application, accusing it of hosting Kurdish militants.
Man, fuck Turkey
Yes, if you want privacy then you need a good VPN provider
Mt ISP can’t see my traffic or my DNS lookups lol
This is misinformation. Flatpaks are far less secure than installing from apt. All packages installed from apt are cryptographically signed. This isn’t the case with flatpaks.
Ah, if it’s only available on flatpaks, that’s why few people know about it.
Flatpak is a very insecure method to download software BTW, you probably should avoid it
Edit: It’s curious that I’m getting downvoted for stating a fact. It seems a lot of flatpak users don’t understand security. But that’s kinda the point: even the flatpak developers don’t understand the difference between integrity and authenticity
Flatpak currently does not provide authenticity, and one developer made it clear that he doesn’t understand why that matters in the above ticket that requested signatures of packages back in 2016. It’s been 7 years and still they haven’t fixed this. I don’t think the flatpak team understands or cares about security.
How is this better than zim? Is this in the Debian repos?
Because my ISP is in a country where they can legally sell my data. My VPN is not.
And my VPN provider doesn’t know who I am.