It’s really hard to see that as an equal issue when one of those sides is literally in charge of creating & enforcing the law.

People proclaiming stupidities is a problem that is magnitudes smaller than an administration with the ability and will to perform stupidities

6 years ago when this article was written, yeah, there was some trepidation because this phrase was being used by the OUN. But they didn’t create it, don’t own it, it’s not theirs. It’s a slogan for broad Ukrainian support.

Hitler drank milk, but calcium is not just for fascists

Not “all of a sudden”, the reason he was even there in the first place was to negotiate minerals AND security

In a 5-4 ruling written by Justice Samuel Alito, the court blocked the EPA from issuing permits that make a permittee responsible for surface water quality, or “end result” permits – a new term coined by the court.

I also don’t know, but get really suspicious if Alito needs to invent a “new term” to frame the case with

They’d absolutely blame Nancy Pelosi for that!

And for you, good sir!

But there are way, way more comments, posts, and articles about how he’s reneged on his promises & will continue to hurt people for the sake of hurting people… In the face of authoritarianism, you’re worried about decorum?

The tone he had on Monday’s Daily Show was, “let’s not start throwing around the word fascism yet”. He apparently still has faith in the courts? https://archive.org/details/COM_20250128_070000_The_Daily_Show

Right, I’m ok with the TV (or local assistant) knowing I’m in the room. But why does personal convenience have to become the panopticon, tech bros?

I was only familiar with the edited version for years & was a little disappointed when I heard the original. “Crush” is a better lyric. It’s a double entendre and doesn’t sound so… thirsty? I’m also not a Spanish speaker, but would think a proper translation should infer the playfulness of that double meaning.

C) everything goes to shit, and somehow of course, it’s the left’s fault again! Tada!

I wouldn’t say that it’s a vote split down gender lines, but we do seem to be deciding if we want to keep trying to achieve gender equality or go full throttle on toxic patriarchy