We should be talking about the average person being able to win >50% of the time, not the ideal human who wins on an off-chance.
Personally, I’m guessing I’d be somewhere in the range of a medium sized calf
We should be talking about the average person being able to win >50% of the time, not the ideal human who wins on an off-chance.
Personally, I’m guessing I’d be somewhere in the range of a medium sized calf
This is the real insidious thing about internet enshittification. It’s run by publicly traded corporations so it’s not enough just to squeeze every possible dollar out of your customers, you have to keep ramping up the squeeze. Even once you’re bringing in billions and billions of pure profit with a product that everyone loves, you have an actual legal duty to your shareholders to make it worse in an effort to try to grow the profit even more
That still wouldn’t prove that the neural processes that make real people intelligent and sentient are fundamentally different what an LLM program does. For all we know, the human brain could just be a learning model running on a meat machine with a huge context window and enough processing power for emergent sentience
The biggest housing bubble of all time isn’t world news?
No points for photo radar tickets