• 3 Posts
  • 62 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle
rss




  • Yes, California does do controlled burns. This senator is being disingenuous as are any other talking heads claiming they don’t.

    The state has increased the budget for and amount of controlled burns (as well as creation of firebreaks which both enable controlled burns and reduce spread of wildfires) in recent years, including after the federal government under trump reduced maintenance of federal lands. Voters have supported this through propositions as well including one last election.

    Controlled burns also require a lot of care and resources or they can turn into wildfires, so there’s only so many the state can do at a time. The past few years have actually allowed for more than previously.

    LA had unseasonably low precipitation and high winds that contributed to the rapid spread of the current fires.

    Should California do more controlled burns? Probably, but the state is very much doing what it can.

    But, it’s easier to point fingers at the very people taking preventative measures than help your countrymen in a time of need.





  • Not to defend Google because they violate privacy in many ways, but they absolutely do not share that level of data with partners. This is not some ethical decision. The data is just far too valuable to Google. Google is extracting as much value as they can from users, advertisers, and publishers, and if they sold access to the data itself, publishers and advertisers could begin cutting out Google. Instead Google gives advertisers a lot of control over what users to target, and uses the data inside a black box to show those ads.

    Google is hoarding your data and using it to show you ads with minimal built-in opt-outs. But they aren’t sell your data.