I forgot the golden role of “ai bad”.

AI is a tool. A useful tool for software development. But with any tool, it’s possible to misuse it. With AI it’s easy to abuse it and get it to write everything for you and not think about the output. That usually ends up with bad code. You can also use it for debugging or code review or giving a solution to a tough technical problem that can be used as a starting point. That’s how these devs used it. That is a good way to use the tool.

Just because corporations overuse AI in software development doesn’t mean the tool is bad.

Not this world, just one stupid nation made up of stupid people.

All professional software development is using AI. This is normal and to be expected. Code AI contributions are rightfully handled differently in Steam’s AI disclosure.

consolateon

The French say yes.

Very neat, didn’t know this existed. Will definitely try this out next time I model

The posted article literally has it in the first sentence

What does the state of the highway have to do with traffic lights? Are the ones in need of repair have less traffic lights?

Don’t worry, they’ll let you know by posting memes about being vegan

Ok, when?

Lemmy users would’ve hated when the calculator was invented.

Opus reviewing an entire codebase is pretty impressive. I use it a lot for some hobbyist stuff and its great at finding bugs, security issues, and just basic stuff like spelling/grammer mistakes.

But of course, on Lemmy you’ll get downvoted because “ai bad”

I can’t vote, it’s illegal for me to