Lol, go back to what exactly? I remember the overwhelming majority of parents had literally zero clue how to deal with the internet when it first became a thing. Children went online and saw all kinds of traumatizing shit.

I mean, at least people warned you to never post your name, age or pictures online.

The status quo sucks, but going back doesn’t sound great either.

I don’t, I’m within the group of privileged people who can pick and choose. I work part-time as of recently and feel alright about my job. I assume the same goes for you?

If you have no dependents, no pre-existing debts to pay, are preferably young, live in a country with a good economy, got enough money or access to a decent social security program, then the internalized worldview might be the main problem.

Not saying this doesn’t apply to quite a few people, but there are a lot of others who don’t have that luxury.

Let’s say we decide that morals what is right and wrong is decided entirely by ourselves. Then it makes perfect sense to defend your own opinions and to disagree with people who disagree with your stance on right and wrong. You chose those morals after all. It’s kinda part of the deal that they can’t apply to you alone (example: when is it just to kill?)

So I don’t see a contradiction.

I guess this post is about Inability to engage with a different set of morals. But assuming that their is an absolute truth for right and wrong wouldn’t solve that issue, so I’m not sure why they brought it up.

The original commenter said that burning down Teslas might destroy the owners life. This is a car that costs somewhere between 40000 (?) and 150000 dollars. Someone who can afford that is highly likely to recover. That’s what this commenter pointed out.

Stating that isn’t saying that it’s cool to burn down a random person’s car.

I do that in reverse, lol. Except I’m also not a native speaker. “Rephrase this, it should sound more scientific”.

Probably, but I’d only believe that there is really nothing to be done once I see someone actually left-leaning attempt everything in their toolbox.

I believe Sanders would have tried to change as much as possible in the US. I also believe that he would have failed regarding a lot of things. Would have really liked to see him try though.

I get it and I don’t disagree, but- Well, I for one wouldn’t mind some radical change. Just not in the direction that it is going right now. Radical in itself is nothing bad, when the status quo is as bad as it is.

It’s terrible advice if you struggle with it.

I however cry quite easily. In hindsight all this “don’t suppress your feelings” advice honestly always felt more directed at boys and men.

Learning to turn off and distract yourself from bad feelings is also a skill. I think quite a few people - especially women - struggle with that, me included.

They’re clearly destabilizing the countries integrity by checks notes vandalizing cars! Property damage is obviously much worse than actual violence, so long as the property is expensive enough. /s

Now this is fucking cool! Sure it will probably take some time to become affordable, but that it’s possible at all is awesome.

I mean, I was super curious what Sanders could’ve done if he had the chance. Instead, we got the opposite experiment.

If democrats in the US vote for stuff like Biden, then they’re not voting for any radical change. Trump isn’t comparable to that.