Start with an interpreter just running on a website. Low barrier to entry is key at the start

It’s small steps, not medium steps dammit!

The social contract of tolerance

Not much of a right then, is it?

Debunked

What percentage were construction workers?

??? Both options are the same thing tho?

Welcome to old.

Bing chat will do it

Are the libs not going for pharmacare?

“tits”

We just need to dig a deep enough hole in a subduction zone so it eventually turns into lava

Human code review is very error prone

I mean, sure. That pharmacare though…

Not sure I follow the “FPTP with layers” argument. After each layer, the votes go to the next choice rather than being wasted. Vote splitting gone. That’s the bad part of FPTP taken care of. There’s still one winner, but proportional voting is orthogonal to ballot type

And you only get final results when all counting is complete, but ballot counts could definitely be published as they come in (N ballots with order ABCD, M ballots with order DBA, etc)

I like ranked ballots more. Just a bunch of easy binary decisions of which candidate I like more. With the other ones, I feel like I’m betraying my favourite if I rank or approve of anyone else equally.

misis + sippi

mister + sippi

Taking part in a genocide does taint it a tad

Immigration helps with healthcare though. We get working, tax paying adults, and skip the expensive child phase.

Messing with immigration numbers would throw off other systems too. Makes way more sense to just directly fix the problem of not enough housing. It’s not like cutting immigration would do anything to reverse the problem anyway. Housing looks like it’s just an excuse to blame immigrants, because somehow the solution always seems to be blaming immigrants.

I though pharmacare was one of those things that paid for itself with the single point of negotiation and reduced need for emergency care? I don’t really remember the numbers…