The article doesnt tell what edits he did to his posts to “poison” the ai…

Pretty cool invention!

Yess

Gluttony would be a better word.

Obesity is something else. People rarely actually want to be obese, but who is actually bothered by having too much money? I guess that makes the wording sound weird to me.

Are we actually herbivores that are oportunistic carnivores?

have these people never seen themselves? eating chicken all day?

OpenAI gave the sensitive content to an unsecure third party. Its a risky move, so they have responsability, regardless of this being a standard behaviour.

Calling that financial obesity is so weird.

We may just start charging for this ultra-specialized skill

Being a predator is not a property, its a relation. X is a predator of Y… but not of Z, and is a prey of V and not of W.

It is.

Whats the issue with using their discovery servers? Has something changed regarding this?

Maybe thats a law where you live but ive definitely been contacted by a bunch of companies through wpp without having contacted them first.

Vargas’ Brazil was the most prominent fascist nation outside Europe.

Was it really though? Seems like a bit of a stretch… But ok.

Maybe the japanese empire (before ww2), or the south african apartheid regime, but vargas?

Brazil did have the integralist party which was the largest fascist-like movement outside europe, but vargas didnt really go along with them.

Youre too optimistic

Wdym suddenly?

Then who will be held responsible for its decisions?

I see what you mean now.

The person you responded to at first, i think they played along with that comparison to argue that, even if it was a disability, being annoying doesnt justify bullying. They werent saying it is a disability, they were using another persons premise to argue that bullying isnt justified.

I know some people that are annoying in a way that doesnt seem to be a choice, they have a natural way of behaving that annoys people. And sometimes, what seems to be a choice to be annoying is just manifestations of a persons natural characteristics. So I think we cant actually make a clear distinction between whats a voluntary behaviour and a natural uncensored behaviour. We should just learn to deal with people less aggressively.

Is the issue in choosing to do something differently? Voluntarily steping out of a cultural standard? Why is it such a pain in the ass? Did he write your consititution like this? Cant you just not read his comments if you dont want to?

I guess your sentiment is what helps humanity cosolidate any culture at all. But its way too big of a reaction, really…

Language evolution is not so much directed by utility, is it?