• @gerikson
    link
    English
    411 months ago

    My experience is with whatever Gnome-centered desktop ships with Ubuntu. It’s on a headless box that I shut off today for ¤reasons, so I have no clue what it’s called.

    And thank god I am hale and hearty and sighted and a nerd, and it’s not my daily driver, so I have not yet been cut to ribbons on the sharp edges. I do however have a blind partner, whom I know better than to try to impose Linux on. Her daily experience with the shit webdev/mobdev pumps out daily is not good, so yeah, there’s plenty of blame to go around.

    • @anyhow2503@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -311 months ago

      My experience is with whatever Gnome-centered desktop ships with Ubuntu. It’s on a headless box that I shut off today for ¤reasons, so I have no clue what it’s called.

      I have no idea what Canonical calls it either. It’s basically just a skin that makes Gnome look a bit more shit as far as I can tell.

      Her daily experience with the shit webdev/mobdev pumps out daily is not good

      I thought this was about C-niles, but apparently all mobile and web devs are shit as well. I’m sure that random mobile and web apps are somehow very relevant to Linux DEs being accessible or not, but since you already “know better”, there’s no need to discuss this further really.

      • @gerikson
        link
        English
        411 months ago

        Accessibility is shit everywhere, much like Linux reply guys apparently.

        • @selfMA
          link
          English
          411 months ago

          behind almost every shit linux design decision, there’s a handful of reply guys with nothing but the time and energy to defend it to the death, to the detriment of everyone involved