• @gerikson
    link
    English
    106 months ago

    And the arguments seem to boil down to them saying “if you wanna transition, just do it”, and Zack is all like “nooooooo you must convince me not to via Rationality!!!”

    (sorry if I’m being flippant, this person seems to be in a lot of mental distress, but they’re also kinda big deal in the community? Like fucking gwern weighed in a bit sarcastically?)

    • Phil
      link
      English
      106 months ago

      Who knows? They seem to know all these people personally, so I guess they attend rationalist cuddle puddles in SV or something.

      I ran into them online a year ago when a Twitter follow shared their last essay with some acerbic comments about the lengths (both in the mental & absurd word count senses) they were going to do deny their desire to transition & they appeared in the comments after I made a snarky remark along the lines of “methinks the lady doth protest too much”. Still quite proud of that one.

    • @Amoeba_Girl
      link
      English
      66 months ago

      yeah i noticed yesterday there’s a link to (one of) Zack’s blog(s) in SSC’s sidebar.

      • David GerardOPMA
        link
        English
        56 months ago

        so what precisely is Zack supposed to be good at in Rationality other than Blancharding?

          • David GerardOPMA
            link
            English
            76 months ago

            when you need to add an exponential notation option to wc

              • @bitofhope
                link
                English
                56 months ago

                https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/coreutils.git/tree/src/wc.c#n507

                The word count variable is an intmax_t, so assuming ISO C (it’s GNU so probably not but whatever) it has to be at least C99 and thus support at least 64 bit long long.

                Looking forward to the nine quintillion word LW posts. Wonder if I should submit a patch to make wc(1) use GMP for future proofing purposes…