if they just want to improve reaction time, they could simply do meth like more normal people instead of squandering nonrenewable, industrially critical helium on wanking off to yudkovsky
argon is heavier than nitrogen, meaning that narcotic effect would be even stronger. if you go down periodic table, xenon is almost potent enough to be used on its own as anesthetic
how this all actually works is one of bigger open problems in medicine, but i’m pretty sure that simplified hypothesis of lipid solubility, recalled by some orange posters is mostly wrong. my guess is that because 1. chiral anesthetics exist and have different potencies while having exactly the same physical properties, 2. there are compounds that look like anesthetics, but have opposite activity, and 3. this very neat paper that i can’t find right nowhttps://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/21/6/RC136.full.pdf where authors identified pocket on membrane side ( = greasy) of GABA receptor that when filled just the right way with anesthetic will open this channel, meaning narcosis if you put enough of it. they found it through directed mutagenesis study ie when that pocket was artificially filled with bigger aminoacid side chains no change was observed. we know that similar effects appear in other channels, for example NMDA
this is a secret plan to make orange posters speak funny
also don’t, helium is nonrenewable resource and pretty useful (for MRIs and such)
How about Argon? (Not that I’m going to waste money on Argon when I don’t even have a gas welding rig.)
if they just want to improve reaction time, they could simply do meth like more normal people instead of squandering nonrenewable, industrially critical helium on wanking off to yudkovsky
argon is heavier than nitrogen, meaning that narcotic effect would be even stronger. if you go down periodic table, xenon is almost potent enough to be used on its own as anesthetic
how this all actually works is one of bigger open problems in medicine, but i’m pretty sure that simplified hypothesis of lipid solubility, recalled by some orange posters is mostly wrong. my guess is that because 1. chiral anesthetics exist and have different potencies while having exactly the same physical properties, 2. there are compounds that look like anesthetics, but have opposite activity, and 3. this very neat paper
that i can’t find right nowhttps://www.jneurosci.org/content/jneuro/21/6/RC136.full.pdf where authors identified pocket on membrane side ( = greasy) of GABA receptor that when filled just the right way with anesthetic will open this channel, meaning narcosis if you put enough of it. they found it through directed mutagenesis study ie when that pocket was artificially filled with bigger aminoacid side chains no change was observed. we know that similar effects appear in other channels, for example NMDA