• @Soyweiser
    link
    English
    115 months ago

    Facilitating ransomware is good actually, is quite the take. But yeah this is a ‘we dislike all cryptocurrencies’ zone.

    • @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -55 months ago

      Lol. I don’t particularly like ransomware, but I am willing to deal with it to have privacy. Because the privacy to run ransomware gives regular people the privacy to do what they want to do that’s perfectly legal. Take an extreme example. Forks should be banned because you can stab people with them. Maybe five people die per year of being stabbed by forks, but hundreds of millions of people eat with them and never stab anybody, so they should all be banned.

      • @Amoeba_Girl
        link
        English
        125 months ago

        Oh please do tell us more about all the legal activity you’re getting up to! What kinds of things are you buying?

      • @Soyweiser
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I’m already missing r/bitcoins usertags. You certainly deserve one.

        Bonus of no longer being on reddit, when weird people get banned they no longer can DM me personally because they confused me for being a reasonable person open to hearing more.

      • @gerikson
        link
        English
        75 months ago

        Except with crapto the proportion is the other way round, thousands of people use them to commit crimes but only tens of people use them legitimately.

        So banning forks is a dumb thing, banning crapto is a boon to humanity.

        • @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -45 months ago

          Chain analysis companies even admit that about 1% of crypto use is for criminal activity. The other 99% is lawful use

          • @bitofhope
            link
            English
            95 months ago

            Shit, here I thought that at least buying illegal drugs was a somewhat defensible reason to deal in crypto and now you’re telling me 99% of it is not even for that?

            You’re not making monero look cooler, you’re just making digital privacy look worse.

            • David GerardOPMA
              link
              English
              10
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              the 1% claim is a distorted version of a report from Chainalysis that said 1.5% of bitcoin use was definitely identified as crime

              even then, they calculated this by carefully ignoring most of the crime

              • @bitofhope
                link
                English
                95 months ago

                I dunno, sounds reasonable to me. Just like when recent studies by independent groups of experts on fintech enthusiasts found that investing in cryptocurrency was correlated with up to 70% increased body odor, a statistically significant drop in attractiveness and between one and three standard deviations below baseline level of self awareness.

                The independent group consisted of me. The papers are available if you pay me 350€ for a yearly subscription to my journal.

          • @selfA
            link
            English
            85 months ago

            brings up monero

            about 1% of crypto use is for criminal activity. The other 99% is lawful use

            time for you to fuck off now

            • @selfA
              link
              English
              85 months ago

              and of course their entire post history is just generic crypto misinformation with a weird monero obsession

      • flere-imsaho
        link
        English
        75 months ago

        i, knowing the effects of ransomware on various institutions, am willing to deal with people who are willing to deal with it (on other people’s systems) by kicking said people in the face. i hope you don’t mind, nothing personal, really, just a policy matter.