• @LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Yeah I get what you’re saying. Here’s the thing though, scalping only exists in scenarios where there is a large difference between MSRP and true market value. That doesn’t usually happen, and when it does, it’s usually for a good reason. Like take concert tickets- most artists don’t WANT to sell to the highest bidder, they want all (or at least more) of their fans to have a chance. So, assuming there’s a reason for the price gap beyond the manufacturer being dumb, I think it’s a scummy thing to do.

    • @takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Perhaps we have a different definition of “flip” but the one familiar with is taking a home in bad shape then fixing it (usually yourself, because hiring a contractor would cost more than the profit). I don’t flip myself, but I don’t see this as a negative. Someone put effort to improve the house and gets profit from it (yes, there’s an issue that they might use the cheapest materials, because they won’t live there and just want to make it look good, but that’s a different issue).

      The biggest issue in driving prices up is low supply and high demand.

      We should change zoning laws to allow building more houses and also place restrictions on houses purchased by corporations and international investors. Oh yeah, Airbnb is another one that drives prices up.

      • @SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        The issue with flipping is that they draw from the same pool of housing as the rest of the people. If a party is interested in purchasing a house to live in and along comes a flipper and purchases it instead, the flipper will add on a profit for his service, that nobody asked for.

        Presumably, the party that wanted to live in had already seen the state of the house and was prepared to pay for fixes. Let’s say both them and the flipper would use the cheapest materials and labour possible, levelling out the equation. The profit for the flipper has to come from somewhere then - something extra added beyond the labour and material cost - something somebody who would live there would not have to pay in normal circumstances. They do DIY to save on labour? Great - they can be contractors then, not flippers.

        This means to me that flipper not only does not add any value to the house, but inflicts extra costs upon any good faith buyers. Add to that the fact that tastes vary greatly between people and they might actually do some damage by decorating or remodelling in a style thay may not appeal to everyone, or in a bland style. All of it could have been avoided if the flipper just fecked off. House flippers are like the people rushing to pump your gas for you before you get out of the car and then expecting a tip.

      • @OpenStars@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        That was the old way - this meme is good b/c it is aware of that and discounts those situations, while the person you are replying to did not display that awareness.

    • @Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      That’s today’s Lemmy Moment of the day.

      Besides, don’t house flippers generally renovate the house, and generally make it more presentable?

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Source: I’ve spent more hundreds of hours than I can count doing sub work for house flippers. There’s nothing defensible about what they do.

          Clearly there is something defensible… You did the hundreds of hours of work. And you can’t complain about fit and finish if you were the one doing the work.

    • @theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I get it. Scalping sucks, but one is an annoyance, one causes a measurable impact, and the last is fucking murdering people and collapsing the foundation of society.

      It’s all wrong, but the magnitude of harm is much bigger