The actually not even really a hatchet job NYT piece on SlateScott that mostly just called him a weird little guy has nonetheless created a festering psychic wound that oozes to this day. Here manifests as an interview with the author on LW. See also: discussion on reddit.

My favorite section, talking about how people are mad that be brought up Scott’s notorious race stuff™️:

CM: That’s great. That’s a valid position. There are other valid positions where people say, we need to not go so close to that, because it’s dangerous and there’s a slippery slope. The irony of this whole situation is that some people who feel that I should not have gone there, who think I should not explore the length and breadth of that situation, are the people who think you should always go there.

  • @YourNetworkIsHaunted
    link
    English
    168 months ago

    The amount of hand-wringing about “why is it so important to trace how these people are connected to Peter Thiel or Elon or other incredibly wealthy right-wing ideologues who have a measurable impact on people’s lives.”

    Why can’t the journalists just join our special club where we talk about changing the world in the most disconnected way imaginable. It’s like they think we’re trying to take over the world or something.

    • @YourNetworkIsHaunted
      link
      English
      158 months ago

      You can’t have it both ways. Either you’re completely publicly irrelevant or you’re of public interest, and if you’re making yourself a public figure you shouldn’t be shocked when the public takes an interest in who you are, why you say the things you do, and who you associate with.

      • @sinedpick
        link
        English
        158 months ago

        no, haven’t you heard? Great minds discuss IDEAS not PEOPLE. You’re basically a Vogue cover article if you even dare delve into networks of powerful people beyond taking them at face value.