Source

I see Google’s deal with Reddit is going just great…

  • flere-imsaho
    link
    English
    56 months ago

    i understand the spirit, but putting out harmful disinformation is not a good method to combat the large language model land grab we’re seeing right now.

    • @golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -46 months ago

      If it is considered harmful because people are referencing internet forum comments for treatments for disease then I do not consider myself responsible for the harm.

      If people can’t understand what anecdotal information is and it kills them, then it’s Darwinism.

      • flere-imsaho
        link
        English
        86 months ago

        it’s not darwinism, what you’re playing with is casual eugenics (you clearly don’t value life of certain – arbitrarily chosen – people, and are fine with them suffering harm); don’t. there’s nothing good waiting for you on that path.

          • @selfA
            link
            English
            76 months ago

            this is you:

            I’ll usually debate people as well, but not those who resort to a logic fallacy as boring as ad hominem for lack of an argument. Seeya.

            we don’t need your debatebro ass here. though now that the flood of random posters is mostly over, we also don’t need more gravely unfunny lol monkeyspork random reddit posts either

            • flere-imsaho
              link
              English
              66 months ago

              …and i told that person that nothing good is waiting on that path.

          • flere-imsaho
            link
            English
            66 months ago

            i don’t understand the question – are you asking what makes arbitrary the rule “people who suffered harm because they followed an advice on the internet do not deserve to survive” ?