• @Soyweiser
    link
    English
    116 months ago

    Could you not make these kinds of stupid arguments just to score debate points?

      • @froztbyte
        link
        English
        126 months ago

        Where the fuck was the insult? Wild

        You’re the one making incoherent illogical driveby comments, clown

          • @froztbyte
            link
            English
            106 months ago

            A masterful performance, an opus of ineptitude! Brava!

              • @froztbyte
                link
                English
                96 months ago

                aww, babby threw a tantrum and pressed the eject button when they found that no-one here would put up with their toxic bullshit

                • flere-imsaho
                  link
                  English
                  96 months ago

                  oh ffs. one goes voting in the european elections, as one does, and all the fun passes by, unread, deleted, non-existing.

                  • @froztbyte
                    link
                    English
                    106 months ago

                    it’s not entirely gone, my notification cache has 'em and I could share, but tldr the moment there was pushback they switched to ad hominem arguments and faux outrage and namecalling: I was even called a genetic regression! it was most entertaining

              • @selfA
                link
                English
                66 months ago

                deleting your stupid fucking debatebro tantrum won’t save your posting privileges when you piss off everyone who actually posts here

      • @Soyweiser
        link
        English
        10
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yes, and that was a stupid argument unrelated to the point made that evolution used this raw data to do things, thus raw data in LLMs will lead to AGI. You just wanted debate points for ‘see somewhere there is data in the process of things being alive’. Which is dumb gotcha logic which drags all of us down and makes it harder to have normal conversations about things. My reply was an attempt to make you see this and hope you would do better.

        I didn’t call you stupid, I called the argument stupid, but if the shoe fits.

        E: the argument from the person before you ‘evolution was created us with a lot of data and then we created the internet’ is also silly of course, as if you just go ‘well raw data created evolution’ then no matter how we would get AGI (say it is build out of post quantum computers in 2376) this line of reasoning would say it comes from raw data, so the whole conversation devolves into saying nothing.

        • @froztbyte
          link
          English
          116 months ago

          No no see, since everything is information this argument totally holds up. That one would need to categorize and order it for it to be data is such a silly notion, utterly ridiculous and unnecessary! Just throw some information in the pool and stir, it’ll evolve soon enough!

          • @mountainriver
            link
            English
            76 months ago

            The number of rocks in my garden is information. Yet, despite counting them all, I have not found AGI. So I must need more information than that.

            Clearly, counting all the rocks in Wales should do it. So much counting.

        • @o7___o7
          link
          English
          76 months ago

          it was straight up “not even wrong”