• @Haagel@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know what I mean, brother. There’s a huge scope of difference between applied sciences and natural philosophy. Our technological advancements fail to resolve fundamental questions about the human condition. Scientists rarely study epistemology or philosophy in order to attain our degrees and I think it shows in the public trend toward scientism.

          • @fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lol, I love when the woo community can’t argue in good faith, so have to artificially drag science to their level by calling it “scientism”.

            Magic isn’t real because you can’t prove it’s real, and science isn’t opposed to magic, because magic isn’t on the playing board.

            • Grail (capitalised)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              I’m a degree-holding job-working scientist and I love science. I also love magic. Magic can be proven. Scientists have published hundreds of papers on the powerful placebo effect, also known as magic. Don’t tell me you’re going to deny the existence of the placebo effect?