• @jaschop
    link
    English
    101 month ago

    This isn’t a copyright thing. This is a tech regulation thing, that creates the possibility for data protection agencies to stick their noses in AI company’s business.

    • @spookex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -31 month ago

      General purpose” mostly means LLMs. Companies have a year to write documentation and promise to follow copyright.

      Says it right there

      • @bitofhope
        link
        English
        91 month ago

        Takes me much less than a year to promise to do anything.

        • Steve
          link
          English
          71 month ago

          I love how the time factor is always ignored when tech companies eventually comply with regulation or just do the right thing. “at least they did it” isn’t an argument, it’s a consolation.

          It took airbnb over a year(!) to show all the fees up front on the search results page instead of waiting to show them on the checkout page. That’s over a year after their asshat CEO announced on twitter that they would be doing it (to quell the social media uproar about how deceptive it was)

      • flere-imsaho
        link
        English
        91 month ago

        how does allowing the ai companies to ignore copyright improve the situation, pray tell?

        • @Architeuthis
          link
          English
          81 month ago

          Next time Lars Ulrich sues you you’ll be able to say you needed the Some Kind of Monster mp3s for AI research. It’s foolproof.

      • @bitofhope
        link
        English
        51 month ago

        This quote got me rent free. If I break a law I don’t like for a couple of years, do I also get another year to “promise” to stop breaking it in the future?