None of what I write in this newsletter is about sowing doubt or “hating,” but a sober evaluation of where we are today and where we may end up on the current path. I believe that the artificial intelligence boom — which would be better described as a generative AI boom — is (as I’ve said before) unsustainable, and will ultimately collapse. I also fear that said collapse could be ruinous to big tech, deeply damaging to the startup ecosystem, and will further sour public support for the tech industry.

Can’t blame Zitron for being pretty downbeat in this - given the AI bubble’s size and side-effects, its easy to see how its bursting can have some cataclysmic effects.

(Shameless self-promo: I ended up writing a bit about the potential aftermath as well)

  • @celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113 months ago

    There are a ton of companies selling value based companies on “AI” services, when in actuality, it’s just repackaged ChatGPT. Real AI based on ML requires a ton of resources and time in order to train a viable model that does 1 thing properly. Having ChatGPT summarize or write emails for you is not AI and is not adding value to your organization. I’m waiting for that realization to hit.

    • @froztbyte
      link
      English
      123 months ago

      Real AI based on ML

      a phrase so loadbearing you could build skyscrapers out of it

      • Match!!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        “custom-built AI based on sound data science”?

    • @Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -143 months ago

      Summizing Emails is a valid purpose. If you want to be pedantic about what AI means, go gatekeeper somewhere else.

      • @khalid_salad
        link
        English
        163 months ago

        go gatekeeper somewhere else

        Me, showing up to a chemistry discussion group I wasn’t invited to:

        Alchemy has valid use cases. If you want to be pedantic about what alchemy means, go gatekeep somewhere else.

      • @Architeuthis
        link
        English
        163 months ago

        Summizing Emails is a valid purpose.

        Or it would have been if LLMs were sufficiently dependable anyway.

      • @selfA
        link
        English
        133 months ago

        go gatekeeper somewhere else

        who the fuck are you again? go post somewhere else

      • @gerikson
        link
        English
        133 months ago

        JFC how many novel-length emails do you get in a week?

        I think a more constructive way to handle this problem is to train people to write better emails.

          • @gerikson
            link
            English
            113 months ago

            “AI, please summarize this LW”

            “Certainly. Here is the summary: give all your money to Yud or burn in virtual hell forevermore”

      • @froztbyte
        link
        English
        93 months ago

        ah yes, thanks for that extremely valuable driveby input that you gave after someone most definitely was speaking directly to you

        oh, wait. hang on. sorry, I just checked my notes here. it’s the other thing, the opposite one.