This survey is from the Post Open project ( postopen.org [will open in separate tab or window]). Please help us by filling this out, even if it’s to say you don’t approve of our project. You will have a chance to tell us anything you like at the end of the survey.

  • @zbyte64
    link
    61 month ago

    Reading their solutions is interesting; wanted to call out the following because it plays nice if you don’t agree with their whole prescription:

    Don’t dilute the Open Source brand. Post-Open will never call itself Open Source, because it has different rules. The Post Open license actually enforces that.

    • @jeffhykin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think it could be a great solution. I’ve never considered it before. That said there’s one sticking point for me:

      Apportion payment to developers based on software use by paid users and the size of their contribution to that software.

      That^ . That needs a lot more detail. If they provide solid details – details that most can agree on – then I will actually be on board with the solution.

      • @zbyte64
        link
        11 month ago

        Yeah, translating “size of their contribution” to a dollar amount is going to be inherently political. If they’re leaving it open ended to let projects figure it out then that could go poorly…