It’s because there is a vast concerted effort by the political left to destroy Musk now that he is no longer regarded as being strictly on their side. It’s at Trumpian scale these days, in terms of the venom being directed at him.

Reddit is overflowing with non-stop Musk hatred. They spout lie after lie about him in every single thread where he’s a topic. The most popular lie being that his business efforts - ie his success - were funded by an emerald mine that his father owned (neither thing is true).

I say this as an emotionally independent, objective observer of the craziness, I have no stake in it, and don’t feel one way or another about it. The seeming mental illness the topic of Musk seems to draw out of people is astounding however, the herd promptly acts like deranged lunatics when he comes up as a topic.

Until Trump I had never seen anything like it before, in person or online. There must be a name for such a massive scale of crowd insanity, to describe the frothing-at-the-mouth irrationality.

my deranged lunatic hivemind venomous mentally ill frothing-at-the-mouth leftist brain can’t handle how rational this fucking asshole’s take on musk and trump is

there’s also this at the top of the thread:

I’ve been mostly ambivalent about the Musk-era at Twitter—mostly because I just don’t care enough to have an opinion.

This, though. This one makes me angry and disappointed.

Twitter has had such a solid brand for so long. It’s accomplished things most marketers only dream of: getting a verb like “Tweet” into the standard lexicon is like the pinnacle of branding.

turning one of the most popular sites on the internet into a cesspit of transphobia and nazis: ambivalent

musk fails to appreciate the Twitter brand: angry and disappointed

remember, hacker news is a bastion of high-quality discussion. fucking shitheads

  • @kuna
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @selfOPA
      link
      English
      511 months ago

      that’s what that’s called? that’s an incredibly useful term to keep in mind

    • @gerikson
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I don’t accept this characterization. When I say “ignore”, I mean I don’t reply to their comments, or upvote their submissions. (lobste.rs does not have downvotes, but it has flags. I use those when appropriate).

      The important thing for me is that lobste.rs is not a welcoming place for people who promote racism, sexism, homophobia, cryptocurrency, or the worst parts of the California ideology. Do these people exist on the site? Yes, and I know who they are, and I keep an eye on them. Do their comments about these things get massively upvoted? No. Are they banned if they persist? Yes.

      If this changes in a meaningful way, I’m out.

      • @Evinceo
        link
        English
        411 months ago

        That actually sounds pretty good, how do people get invited these days?

        • @gerikson
          link
          English
          111 months ago

          They get an invite from someone who has been a member for more than 70 days 😉

          The invite tree is public and many people (me among them) require a minimum of vetting (code forge account, social media presence) before extending one. PM me with details!

          • @Evinceo
            link
            English
            311 months ago

            Thanks for the courtesy, but I don’t think I’d want to join it with my internet arguments/drama/sneering handle!

      • @gerikson
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        I don’t accept that a few users advocating for using 4chan are actually dangerous, at the level of the community member that inspired the coinage. That’s all.

        If y’all find participating in such a community distasteful, that’s fine. I find it acceptable, but I’m in no way proselyting for it.