Appall and scorn ripped through scientists’ social media networks Thursday as several egregiously bad AI-generated figures circulated from a peer-reviewed article recently published in a reputable journal. Those figures—which the authors acknowledge in the article’s text were made by Midjourney—are all uninterpretable. They contain gibberish text and, most strikingly, one includes an image of a rat with grotesquely large and bizarre genitals, as well as a text label of “dck.”

A dck pck, if you will.

Count me among the “some scientists online” who “questioned whether the text was also AI-generated”. I mean, it’s a disjointed mess. Right off, we get this:

The term “stem cell” was first coined in 1901 by Regaud

Um, no. But if that could be taken for human error, what about a sentence like this:

They were physically sheared and digested with a solution of DnaseI, hyaluronidase, collagenase, and trypsin using a two-step enzymatic digestion method in which the digestive enzymes included DnaseI, hyaluronidase, collagenase, and trypsin.

Just a bit before that, the text does a swerve into what sounds like a specific experiment, which doesn’t fit with its surroundings and is very strange in a review article. My guess is the whole thing was made by stitching together LLM responses.

The publisher, Frontiers Media, is not exactly held in high regard overall.

  • @bitofhope
    link
    English
    319 months ago

    Here’s the pic in its full glory.

    AI generated illustration of a rat with a massive schlong in cross-section and misplaced and misspelled captions: "sentollc stem cells", "Dissilced", "dislocctal stem ells" with the first letter s mirrored, "Rat", "Testtomcels", "dck", "Retat", "iollotte sserotgomar cell", "Spermatocial syem cells", and "Sterrm cells" with the last letters smeared together into some kind of quad-hump letter m

    Tag yourself, I’m Testtomcels

    • @bitofhope
      link
      English
      209 months ago

      An AI illustration of something vaguely biotechnological with lots of incomprehensible labels. Looks a bit like a circuit board.

      This one from the same is also funny

      • @selfA
        link
        English
        209 months ago

        all leftists care about is propronounization stat protemns, translocation, and posting on DMmer

      • @acausal_masochist
        link
        English
        109 months ago

        Reminds me of the plastic placemats I ate off of as a toddler.

    • @selfA
      link
      English
      129 months ago

      di>locttal stem ells was my father’s name. please, call me dck

      like fuck can you imagine looking at nothing but results like these and believing “yep these are the glimmerings of AGI, what a revolutionary technology”

    • Steve
      link
      English
      109 months ago

      this will be in a future gallery exhibition about the beginning of the Art Cynique movement

    • @sc_griffith
      link
      English
      79 months ago

      bond voice I’m retat. rat retat.

    • @blakestaceyOPA
      link
      English
      149 months ago

      Aghast”? No, more like two or three ghast, at least

        • @selfA
          link
          English
          119 months ago

          I’m fairly sure those are the constituent parts of the rat dick as labeled by the AI, yes

      • @bitofhope
        link
        English
        89 months ago

        So bighast, perhaps even polyghast?

  • @V0ldek
    link
    English
    189 months ago

    According to researchers referenced in a 2015 blog post quoted by Allison and James Kaufman in the 2018 book Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science, “Frontiers has used an in-house journals management software that does not give reviewers the option to recommend the rejection of manuscripts” and the “system is setup to make it almost impossible to reject papers”. source

    Ah yes, pear reviw.

    • @bitofhope
      link
      English
      109 months ago

      Recommend publication?
      >yes
      later

  • @blakestaceyOPA
    link
    English
    139 months ago

    And it’s been retracted:

    Following publication, concerns were raised regarding the nature of its AI-generated figures. The article does not meet the standards of editorial and scientific rigor for Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology; therefore, the article has been retracted.

    This retraction was approved by the Chief Executive Editor of Frontiers. Frontiers would like to thank the concerned readers who contacted us regarding the published article.

    • Sailor Sega Saturn
      link
      English
      139 months ago

      At least they didn’t claim to have “high standards”, only “standards”!

    • @froztbyte
      link
      English
      79 months ago

      That wording is a work of art

  • @selfA
    link
    English
    119 months ago

    A dck pck, if you will.

    I am so glad it wasn’t just my brain that went there

    I read an article about this on mastodon earlier, but somehow it seems like it took a long time for anyone to read the text of the paper and realize that’s garbage too

  • @jonhendry
    link
    English
    109 months ago

    To be fair though rodents can have pretty huge balls. Like dragging on the ground behind them huge.

  • @jonhendry
    link
    English
    109 months ago

    I’m not sure the “frontiers in” journals are all that reputable.

    • @blakestaceyOPA
      link
      English
      99 months ago

      My informal impression is that they range from “OK” to “… the Hell?!”.

  • @swlabr
    link
    English
    89 months ago

    Funny, when I ask chatgpt to draw a rationalist, the same thing pops up.