Many are challenging their detention using habeas corpus filings only to be arrested again, in violation of court orders

ICE rapidly re-arresting immigrants released after winning court petitions Many are challenging their detention using habeas corpus filings only to be arrested again, in violation of court orders Cris Seda Chabrier in New York Mon 2 Nov 2026 07.00 EST Immigrants who have been granted release from detention after winning habeas corpus petitions in court are being re-arrested by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The Guardian has identified at least 20 cases nationwide relating to people who were detained after being released on habeas corpus petition in the last year, according to court records, attorneys and media reports.

Increasing arrests and detentions have led to immigrants filing more than 91,000 habeas petitions as they seek to challenge their detentions, according to research by ProPublica. More petitions have been filed since 25 January than during the past three presidential administrations, including Trump’s first term, combined, the outlet found.

A petition of habeas corpus – Latin for “you shall have a body” – challenges in a federal court the government’s right to hold someone in custody while their main legal case is proceeding.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If they re-arrest in contradiction of the judges orders, it should be a mandatory 5 year prison sentence for every ICE Ape involved in the situation, including any management who ordered it.

    • DillDough@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      5 years? The only way to deal with a Nazi is to kill it. Trump himself wrote an EO plainly stating the federal government will hunt down and kill anti-fascists… they want to kill you just because you want to jail them for being fascist fucks.

  • jpreston1986@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    22 hours ago

    “We can sort of win the battle, but we’re going to lose the war. Because in the long run, they’re still going to be able to do what they want to do, which is arrest people and hold them for long periods of time,”

    You know, because fascism. Warrantless searches, denial of the right to trial, deporting random brown people to random countries just to appease the cruelest intentions of their cult leader.

    Jesus fucking christ go vote.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          For me, it was when Biden’s whole term he didn’t do much to stop Trump or roll back any of the crazy stuff he enacted after being elected on a mandate to do exactly that. I guess specifically the fact that nothing happened to Trump after J6 made me lose all hope in the US political/justice system.

          Like I’ll still vote for Democrats because it’s easy, but I have very little faith that it’ll improve anything.

          • europeancricket@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            because the two party system is generally flawed. The republicans take two huge steps back and then they let the democrats do nothing for 4-8 years before continuing their path towards totalitarianism.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      In Louisiana, in the case of another client of Pranzatelli, a federal judge held a senior federal immigration official in contempt of court for violating orders, demanding Ibrahim Mohammed’s release after he had been re-arrested three times by ICE, as first reported by the Banner. Two other federal judges, in Pennsylvania and Minnesota, have also held federal immigration authorities in contempt or threatened to do so.

      Attorneys believe that certain re-detentions are connected to the Trump administration’s push to deport people to third countries.

      “It’s really tethered to the explosion of third country agreements with primarily African nations in the past four months,” said Susanna Booth, senior attorney at Amica Center for Immigrant Rights, based in Washington DC.

      The Trump administration is increasingly sending immigrants who cannot be removed to their home countries, either because the country will not accept them or they have protections from being deported there, to another country entirely, where they don’t hold citizenship and often have no ties. In the past, these immigrants were essentially safe from deportation.

    • azimir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you think an organization already acting illegally would care about the court’s contempt? Who will make them care?

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There is no more social contract and no more law. The sooner people accept this, the better.

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      The courts holding them in contempt just means the feeling is mutual.

      Seriously though, the article says that some judges have held immigration officials in contempt, but didn’t say what that meant. were they arrested? Fined?

      • Pratai@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        It means nothing. If there exists no one to uphold a law, or to hold someone accountable for breaking said law, then the law doesn’t exist- but only for them.

        We still have to abide all laws past present and made up by the chickenshit coward hiding in the Shite House.

    • corvi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can we just get a deal going where one guy gets arrested a few thousand times on paper and we all go home?

  • DjangoFett@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    So its the “law enforcement” equivalent ofa petulant child spreading the peas around on the plate to make it look like they ate more than they did, except the peas are human beings and instead of a petulant child its… Well, a petulant child with frightening power over others.

    Worst timeline.