Can’t be fired but can’t be trusted either. I’m sure he’s smart but if you’re going to have an affair as the head of an industry the US desperately wants to keep away from the Chinese, maybe don’t have one with a Chinese national? And certainly not a Chinese national that is the head of a Chinese company that wants the technology the US desperately wants to keep them from having.
What makes you so sure he’s smart?
“What is the charge? Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?”
Apparently it was some kind of credit card fraud. They didnt have to do him so dirty like that, at least let him finish his succulent meal.
He was completely innocent, he was a victim of identity theft essentially.
He was innocent of the crime they accused him of at the time, but he was a fraudster.
Oh my god the plot thickens! That makes me happy tho lol
Just an affair? C’mon headline, it’s not every day we find out a billionaire and CEO has fallen for a foreign honeypot espionage operation
deleted by creator
He probably thought his shitty jacket was the reason he was getting pussy.
That and the fact that he’s a billionaire.
That’s the joke.
The joke is that it was a Chinese spy. 🙃
The joke is Jensen Huang
Because he is a billionaire and CEO.
Because he can send sanctioned GPUs to China. His personal wealth has little to do with it.
Once, Michael Jordan was greatness. We had hero after hero showing us all what could be done.
Today, we have these people acting as greatness. They’re not. They’re weak men with small minds. Nothing they do could ever survive the field of battle.
I don’t want to be part of technology anymore. It’s boring and everything it does is a worse form of something we already did.
Part of the problem might be that the example of a better hero is just some sports player. While there are things to admire about that level of dedication to something, there’s nothing heroic about playing sports.
Though the problem isn’t so much that sports icons are treated as heroes at all but that I can’t really think of any good heroes to look up to outside of fiction.
Though I also think that maybe we should look up to deeds rather than people, since when it’s a person, that person’s flaws become part of the question, but it’s really the deeds that should be emulated anyways, even for the ones that didn’t have some massive disqualifying flaw come out.
Like if you want to be more like Mr Rogers and do it by just wearing sweater vests and changing shoes when you come inside, you’re missing the point.
Similarly, if a serial killer rushes into a burning building to save a kid and their cat, that’s still admirable, even if it doesn’t get them across the line to “ok person overall”.
If AI is so great, he could have avoided all this drama by just getting an AI mistress. What’s up with that Huang?
OOOoooOOO, Jensen Huang-san.
If AI is so great
How come the AI did not warn him the mistress was a spy?
He’s now famous not only for his leather jacket but also for having let her jack it.
Guess he got…
sunglasses
Huang out to dry.
YEEEEAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!
Hey come and on, two Huangs don’t make a right.
Shut up wisley?
You know in 5th grade I too went through a leather jacket phase. Really cool bomber jacket style that I got at a thrift store. But when I grew out of it I didn’t replace it with a new one and make that my entire personality.
Shout out to the book Red Tide by M. P. Woodward. It’s a military thriller where one of the main plot points is a Chinese spy seducing the son of the CEO of a semiconductor manufacturer, in order to export AI chips to China. The book was published last year. The author worked in naval intelligence, so I guess there may have been rumors about this scenario before…
A bit off topic, but does anyone else hate this fake structure that some articles have? Here it’s these “headings” printed bold.
Why it matters:
Driving the news:
Meanwhile:
Zoom out:
Flashback:
What they’re saying:So. Fucking. Much.
Noticed that there’s no section for evidence lol
Seems super common in reporting as well, I am noting it with basically every NPR news story these days. LLM’s love outputting this format as well. Almost the same thing that is happening with most media, people are so unfocused that you have to repeat things 20 different ways for them to remember, and the lack of actual journalism means they need to fill time with the ‘big stories’.
You mean like Netflix making shows “second-screen” friendly? I doubt lack of focus ever really drove longer articles. It pushes them shorter and more towards bulleted lists and headlines only if anything.
[Insert ad here. Lol.]
Padding out the paragraph count just gives more spots for ads in between or more eyeball time for banner ads, and even if a site isn’t explicitly going for that, all the journalists (real or not) and LLMs are just trained to only write that way now.
What’s fake about it? Idk i like structured writing.
So much is paywalled now that I haven’t read enough articles to even notice that format.
APNews and Al Jazeera
I put these AI articles to another AI to get the bottom line/1 sentence summary.
We all knew he was a dumbshit but GOD DAMN
Who would’ve thought a country run by Pooh Bear would be so skilled at using honeypots.
I’d rather pooh bear than a narcissistic pedophilic rapist war criminal who wants to fuck his own daughter, but who am I to judge?
Hunny pots.
Huang’s wang burst the AI bubble
Are you really going to keep that jacket on in bed?
Yes.
It’s his security blanket.
