HN reacts to a New Yorker piece on the “obscene energy demands of AI” with exactly the same arguments coiners use when confronted with the energy cost of blockchain - the product is valuable in of itself, demands for more energy will spur investment in energy generation, and what about the energy costs of painting oil on canvas, hmmmmmm???

Maybe it’s just my newness antennae needing calibrating, but I do feel the extreme energy requirements for what’s arguably just a frivolous toy is gonna cause AI boosters big problems, especially as energy demands ramp up in the US in the warmer months. Expect the narrative to adjust to counter it.

    • geriksonOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Can you tell me more about why you’re pretty cool with ELIZA? 😉

      • David GerardMA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        we’re talking about you not me. come come elucidate your thoughts. can you elaborate on that?

        • froztbyte
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          (meta: has any llm actually exceeded this level of engagement? I can’t recall seeing a single example. some changes in the sophistication of the language perhaps, but otherwise nothing)