Er. Am I the only one to comment that this is a refreshing change to all the displays in shops, airports, etc that show the many ways that Windows errors and BSODs?
Linux on the desktop? Hell no, it’s on 80’ billboards.
(It’s not Arch btw)
Since the Raspberry Pi has been released it’s pretty common.
Running Windows for digital signage always struck me as an absolute waste of computing power. Just shove some low power Linux SBC into it and forget about it for about a decade or so
A lot of the time, the whole company that runs the signage uses Windows, and the signage just uses one of their standard PCs with their standard Windows image. They probably already have a bunch of spares. Makes it easier for IT if they don’t have to support another configuration.
I just said “You know when Linux has taken over the world? When you don’t see blue screens on billboards.”
I mean, we have systemd-bsod now…
Not that I’ve ever seen it of course.
Same here, was at the airport just last week and saw two screens running windows, absolute joke.
deleted by creator
Looks like systemd to me
that is the exact opposite of systemd: sysvinit
you can recognize it by the iconic makefile line in the output, which indicates the setting CONCURRENCY=makefile has been chosen.
It booted into a GUI afterwards, and had grub installed.
You would have seen Grub way before this screen.
It did and it went by so fast I couldn’t take a pic.
Maybe he did, and took a picture later.
You time travel like a wizard.
Not necessarily Debian
But systemd for sure!
I refuse to believe that Nova Scotia is a real place
It’s in Canada. Which is on Earth! Which is in Canada.
I was gonna say that it looks like every Linux install I’ve ever booted… But then I realized 90% of them have been Debian or Debian-based 😅
Every systemd-based distro should look like that indeed
It looks like my garuda startup
Linux is also used on billboards now? Nice
Always has been
I think I saw Windows on billboards and projectors a few times in my country. Don’t remember seeing Linux much
Maybe because Linux rarely die?
Good point
Always has been
I wonder if this being a digital billboard is actually cheaper than just hiring some workers to swap out the printed advertisement every, I dunno how often they normally change, week or so?
The benefit is being able to display 3+ different ads on rotation that change every minute or two. That, and labor is cheaper when they’re not 50ft off the ground
The digital ones are also visible at night so the advertiser gets more impressions and the billboard ad company can charge more.
So are the printed ones. They just have flood lights pointing at them.
The digital ones are way more visible though, at least the ones I see here. There’s also some here that are printed but don’t have lights, for whatever reason.
Labour is expensive
I dunno how often they normally change, week or so?
Quick bit of googling suggests printed billboards have a ~$1k startup cost to the advertiser then a flat rate monthly fee, so I’d hazard a guess its probably 3-6 months at a time to amortize the startup cost
I like the security camera pointed at the billboard, like someone’s gonna steal it.
Probably for spray paint or other damage. Or maybe for identifying when it fails
Or maybe for identifying when it fails
That’s it exactly.
no, thats the monitor, how else are you supposed to debug it?
I’m pretty sure that’s just a light
Not much need to light a digital billboard.
Unless this is the world’s most cryptic Debian ad, and that’s actually printed on…
Damn, Linux distros are doing advertising now
Nova Scotia is looking a bit ROUGH though.
deleted by creator
We’re all in this together. At least until rent is so high that we just leave lmao
looks like it’s starting cron? I’m assuming that’s debian/ubuntu then.
Could be anything else, but if i had to posit a likely guess that would be mine.
the wilds of Nova Scotia
Walking across the Windsor Street exchange is wild for sure.
They have a cross walk now, I feel so safe now.
Reminds me of the garbage can that keeps crashing at the Tim Horton’s downtown
That looks like a network issue.
And a storage issue as well maybe
The way I see it, it looks like it can’t write the files because it can’t fetch them from the network. Without a lot dump I may very well be wrong, though.
Guess the screen is too small to see the error on the bottom? Geez, they need a bigger screen?
This is almost certainly Ubuntu server
It could literally be anything
The makefile style concurrency shows that it’s probably running sysvinit. The last version of Ubuntu to do that by default was 9.04.
Either it’s a very old distro (Ubuntu 9.04 or earlier, Debian 7 or earlier, RHEL/CentOS 5 or earlier) or it’s a non systemd distro like slackware.
No way, Debian uses systemd, and systemd uses systemd-journald for logging, and doesn’t need cron, because it has timers.
Since systemd is default since Jessie (~2015), the question arises: How old is the billboard? Or how old is the software running on it?
Semi-embedded shit like this is always astoundingly outdated.
I’m on debian bookworm right now and running rsyslogd and cron, because I prefer them.
Cron is active on all my Debian 12 boxes
