• @200fifty
    link
    English
    207 months ago

    In contrast, Web4 identifies products consumers are willing to purchase and comprehends market requirements.

    The crazy and hitherto-unheard-of concept of “selling things people actually want to buy to people who want to buy them”… It’ll never catch on!

    (I mean, it will never catch on for crypto, because applying this philosophy to crypto quickly reveals that no one actually wants the thing they’re supposed to be selling)

  • @gerikson
    link
    English
    167 months ago

    If you can’t get webN to work, just try again with webN+1.

    • @swlabr
      link
      English
      117 months ago

      Anyone declaring a new webN needs to be cast out of society tbh. Tarred and feathered, preferably.

      • @smiletolerantly
        link
        English
        127 months ago

        Damn. Guess you’re not interested in my vision for Web5 then, huh? It’s a shame. I think an internet consisting exclusively of JS-free personal sites only accessible via IPoAC will really catch on.

        • @carlitoscohones
          link
          English
          107 months ago

          IPoAC

          Thanks. I googled that and it was worth it.

            • deborah
              link
              English
              77 months ago

              Aw, I worked with David, not that many years after RFC 1149, and he was a nice guy. It makes me so happy it’s still a thing.

        • @swlabr
          link
          English
          107 months ago

          I’m out because you used too many buzzwords that I actually understand and not enough that I don’t, especially ones that somehow trigger heartburn despite my lack of understanding

  • @V0ldek
    link
    English
    127 months ago

    Big contender for “Worst Website Name Ever”