• pyre@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 years ago

    but also because him dying doesn’t solve the problem. people forget that he’s actually unpopular. him getting replaced would benefit the party. and the real problem is the entire fascist party. their agenda won’t change with TFG dying.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Huh? Yeah, he’s unpopular but voter turnout is such arse, that there is rarely a blowout capable of preventing electors from playing silly buggers with counts.

      If he’s dead, who inherits his mantle and has a likely shot at getting enough popular votes that US fascists can pretend they won but were narrowly cheated?

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Long term it would help the party. In the short term it would hurt them. I expect a LOT of infighting is gonna happen once Trump is gone.

    • Mnemnosyne@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, Trump is a stupid target and this is bad timing. Now if someone had gone after the Supreme Court a year or three ago, that would’ve been a good thing. Even now it might still be. But Trump? Terrible choice of targets. He’s…his relevance has already happened. It’s too late for his death to be positive in any significant way.

      Hell, I suspect that it might boost the Republican candidate, whoever is selected to replace him, unless they wind up having a really nasty fight where various supporters get extremely entrenched against each other. But that’s not likely - Republicans are very tribalist, once they select a candidate, most of them are going to support him, regardless of how badly they were speaking of him five minutes ago when they were in full support of his opponent.