• Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3088 months ago

    So it sounds like they did have plans, or at least ideas, for it but are now backtracking after the 100% deserved backlash.

    • Eager Eagle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      398 months ago

      every company brainstorms at some point and come up with a few good and a lot of bad ideas;

      it doesn’t make it any closer to being a reality, the only difference is that this was made public.

        • @ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          178 months ago

          We have subscription services in cars now.

          I’m betting it’ll happen either way.

          It’s a fucking stupid future.

          • @frunch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            28 months ago

            Exactly–and someone had to make the unpopular decision to announce it and weather the first round of criticisms. They also will be the first to profit from said stupid idea when they roll it out and the dumbs line up to buy it for fomo reasons or whatever

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        288 months ago

        They were running it by to see if the host will accept the parasite. They will be back folks

    • @HRDS_654@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      198 months ago

      The new CEO had the beginning of an idea in an interview. The interviewer tried to push back while still keeping the interview going, but it became messy real quick.

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        348 months ago

        If that’s the new CEO’s first idea, good luck, Logitech.

        Patel: I’m going to ask this very directly. Can you envision a subscription mouse?

        Faber: Possibly.

        • @HRDS_654@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          It was so bad Nilay Patel had to apologize (semi-seriously) about causing a news cycle about a mouse.

      • @DxK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Same thing happened earlier this year with Wendy’s new CEO. His brilliant plan to make a name for himself was rolling out dynamic pricing. After days of well deserved backlash Wendy’s had to come out and walk it back while insisting they had never planned to use this to do lunch/dinner surge pricing.

        • @pirat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          Isn’t that what pizzerias and such often do, though, to get more customers in throughout the day? Where I live, a pizza for lunch is often like 20-40% cheaper than a pizza for dinner, and I think that’s actually alright.

    • @Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      48 months ago

      Still 1000% have those plans, they are just going to get quiet about them externally for a bit longer now.

      • @meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        268 months ago

        Release it as an option with the necessary hardware.

        Start with a comically low sub price and seemingly great features.

        Hook the user base.

        Phase out all non-sub options.

        Compete enshittification.

        Jack up price.

        CEO bails under a golden parachute.

  • Optional
    link
    fedilink
    English
    908 months ago

    CEO: says stupid shit

    Corporate Comms: sigh CLEANUP ON AISLE 3

  • HeyListenWatchOut
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Ah yes, the ol’ “joking about a threesome” trick.

    “What?! Oh, no I mean… I was just joking, honey. I’d never do that… I mean unless…”

    • @dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      488 months ago

      That always reeks of so much insecurity to me. Just own up to it. If you are in a relationship, “sure, I would do a threesome, but only if you actively want it too and we both agreed on the person and what was allowed or forbidden”. Not in a relationship, “Sure, I would be down for a threesome as long as the desires and limits of all people involved are discussed before hand and accepted by all”. There, with that attitude there’s less risk of confusion or misunderstanding.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        198 months ago

        Not sure why you’re getting down votes because this is the way. If you want something, be open and ask for consent. Just be okay with people saying no, too, and you’re good

      • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 months ago

        Wow, a mythical rational adult talking about sexual topics in a mature fashion, that’s like a unicorn!

        But seriously, you’re right on the money. That’s how my wife and I started bringing people into our relationship, and now we have a throuple hahaha.

      • HeyListenWatchOut
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Actually 100% agree. Was more about the meme than real life though.

        Communication, honesty, boundaries that are mutually agreed upon and respected is the sign of a healthy relationship… not any artificial external construct set by religion, peers, or some perceived “norm” from society.

        That being said, I couldn’t think of a more clever comparison to make. 😅

      • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Look, I’m not gay but if my girl wants to bang Andrew Garfield, we’re having a three-way. My only ground rule is no one is allowed to leave anyone else for Andrew Garfield. And that includes Andrew Garfield…

  • @NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Logitech, buy one of the three tiers based on your needs. 10 clicks a day, 15 clicks a day, or unlimited daily click.

    Disclaimer: right click or scroll wheel not included, please purchase add-on package

    • @BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      168 months ago

      SaaS occasionally makes sense but I’m overall against it. Hardware SaaS has been dumb as fuck since AMD tried to charge us extra to unlock cores we already had on the chip and like 6 seconds until we fished out how to get around it.

    • @UselesslyBrisk@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      58 months ago

      Logitech has, in fact, EOLd parts of the video conferencing hardware. At best it may continue to work but no longer recieve updates. At worst teams and zoom deprecate APIs that are critical and force you to upgrade.

    • @BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      I have a POS wireless mouse given to me by a contracting agency in 2004, that still works fine. I traveled with that thing for years.

      I think I’m done with Logitech anything, and they were my go-to for lots of stuff since the late 90’s.

  • @Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    428 months ago

    I mean, they 100% do have tangible plans. And I’m 110% sure that active portions of those plans already underway as well.

    I think what they mean to say is, "the subscription mouse isn’t available today… I mean, unless you like, unless you wanted it to be or whatever? uWu…"

  • @VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    398 months ago

    one of our team members showed me a forever mouse with the comparison to a watch. This is a nice watch, not a super expensive watch, but I’m not planning to throw that watch away ever.

    Then, almost immediately starts talking about Rolex watches as if they are not expensive. This woman is very out of touch with reality like all CEOs.

  • @friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    368 months ago

    That something so ridiculous is within the realm of possibility just shows how absurd the subscription landscape has gotten. It’s sad that they even have to clarify this.

    • @Tilgare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      They have to clarify this, because their CEO said that was something she wanted to make. What they’re actually doing is covering their asses because of all the negative sentiment they’ve stirred up now. It’s actually just a lie to say they have no plans.

      • @jaemo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        Not just wanted to make, the original article implied existence of a prototype. That’s “putting into effect a plan” which, for fans of causality, implies a pre-existing plan.

  • Johanno
    link
    fedilink
    English
    318 months ago

    What they want to sell:

    A mouse with the quality of the mice 20 years ago. And you need to subscribe to software updates. However the subscription is not optional. If you don’t pay monthly you can’t use the mouse.

    What I would actually pay for:

    A high quality mouse with an open interface and maybe open source software for it. So I can maintain the software by myself. Usually you can achieve a high quality standard in a few months, and unless there are some driver issues, it should work forever.

    I have a “gamer mouse” with a lot of features, custom dpi settings, custom color settings, rebinding keys and so on.

    However I used the software once to set it up and on Linux I can’t even change it. I will never receive any updates!

  • @JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    268 months ago

    “no plans” We’re just awfully close and intend to make plans. Fucking hate when CEOs talk, can’t believe anything at face value. Lying sacks of shit.