Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoThe enormous scale of global food waste.cdn.statcdn.comimagemessage-square30linkfedilinkarrow-up190arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up190arrow-down1imageThe enormous scale of global food waste.cdn.statcdn.comBlaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square30linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareathairmor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-22 years agoNot necessarily. This way shows where the biggest impact can be made. If you’re deciding where to spend money to address the issue, your money is better spent in the top four no matter what the per capita numbers are.
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·2 years agoBoth numbers are valuable, but the visualization is bad. Per capita is very nearly not visualized at all.
minus-squareWrufieotnak@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoThat’s not true. It totally depends on the problem and the solution. If there is no economy of scale at force for the solution, it won’t make a difference.
Not necessarily.
This way shows where the biggest impact can be made. If you’re deciding where to spend money to address the issue, your money is better spent in the top four no matter what the per capita numbers are.
Both numbers are valuable, but the visualization is bad. Per capita is very nearly not visualized at all.
That’s not true.
It totally depends on the problem and the solution. If there is no economy of scale at force for the solution, it won’t make a difference.