• @penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1472 months ago

    This is the most horrible way to convince people to vote with you. I, personally, would tell you to go fuck yourself if I weren’t already voting for Harris. Please stop that. You need to convince people why they should vote for your candidate by showing them the difference, not this “or else” bullshit. and if they are not convinced, you let it go. People are free with their damn votes.

    • @Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      492 months ago

      “Or else” isn’t bullshit when it comes from the perspective of anyone who actually has something to lose if Trump wins.

      Everyone who is on the fence or doesn’t feel like they need to vote are just speaking from positions of privilege because they don’t personally have as much on the line. I just find it hard to sympathize with that perspective.

      • @orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        152 months ago

        It’s actually sad that you would talk about privilege. That may apply to some people. What if for example your cousin is living in Palestine? What then? What privilege do you have? If you vote for Harris, you’re guaranteed more of the same.

        The privilege that you have is that you don’t have family members dying from policies that Harris endorses. And I think Trump would be even worse, so there’s a practical argument that people should vote for Harris anyway, but that’s a tough sell if it’s your immediate family or your best friends who are in the literal crosshairs.

        • @Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 months ago

          I’m just sorry to say, but the situation in Palestine is not up for vote right now. This election will not change that outcome, short of keeping the “finish the job” candidate out of office while maybe the more reasonable of the two can eventually decide to do the right thing.

          If none of the “other stuff” that is actually up for vote matters to people, though, then those people aren’t allies and apparently don’t care if they end up living under a christofascist regime that won’t need elections anymore.

          • sunzu2
            link
            fedilink
            72 months ago

            NEVER AGAIN 🤡

            I guess some people’s issues are more important than [others]

            On the farm all animals are equal! But Palestinian get taken to the shed to make this equality work ;)

            • madjo
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              Which candidate will make life for Palestinians better?

              • sunzu2
                link
                fedilink
                32 months ago

                They are getting genocide either way …

                Weird way to call that “better”

          • @orcrist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            42 months ago

            I disagree. I think each voter is going to choose what the relevant issues are and then they’re going to vote. You can try to tell us what issues matter, but people are going to make up their own mind.

            Also, it’s quite obvious that who becomes the next president does have an impact on what happens in Palestine.

      • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        8
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “Or else” isnt bullshit

        then pressure Kamala to change that one far far right wing policy the progressives cant live with and lets win this thing.

      • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Everyone who is on the fence or doesn’t feel like they need to vote are just speaking from positions of privilege because they don’t personally have as much on the line. I just find it hard to sympathize with that perspective.

        I agree with your first sentence, but honestly your second sentence doesn’t matter. No one has the right or ethical high ground to command or threaten another person to vote the way they want, regardless of whether they sympathize with that person’s position.

        Actual Trump voters, many of whom are voting against their own best interests as well as yours and mine, have the right to make their uninformed/hateful/self-harming/selfish (pick one or more as applicable) vote, and so do folks whose vote we disagree with for other reasons.

        We all think our reasons for voting the way we are (including abstaining) are valid, and at the level of the voting booth it seems to me that we have to respect everyone else’s as valid even when we don’t feel they are.

        If we do not do so, I don’t see how that doesn’t lead to either:

        a) commanding another to vote as you desire

        or

        b) thought policing people

        I find either of those to be unacceptable for any purpose.

        • @Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          My perspective is that no one has the right to infringe on the rights of others, and to me any act that facilitates Trump entering the white house creates a greater infringement on human rights than any vote that facilitates Harris.

          These are things that shouldn’t even need to be decided by an election, they should just be codified and not up for vote at all, but here we are.

          • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 months ago

            Persuade all you want.

            Threatening/intimidating/commanding people to vote in a particular way is not OK though. It’s not something where the end justifies the means, and it’s a pandora’s box that should not be opened. OP would be rightly called a threat if a conservative version of it was posted. It’s akin to this, minus the power dynamic.

    • @GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Trump’s track record and intentions for his next term are crystal clear. They are clearly and demonstrably worse than harris’plans or Biden/harris’ previous term.

      That info is widely available. To ignore it now, and claim to need “convincing” is madness at best, or bad faith at worst.

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        I already wasn’t going to vote for Trump, so threatening me with him doesn’t make me want to vote for Democrats, it makes me want both parties to lose.

    • @NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      people are free with their damn votes

      Until they don’t have the right to vote anymore because they threw it away in the final election

    • @RangerJosie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      Convincing people to vote isnt a goal. Liberals, specifically US liberals have this compulsion to fingerwag at anyone who doesnt listen to their self important wankery. Irregardless of the repeated lies, policy failures, lies, can kicking, goal post moving, lies, etc.

      Every election is “This is the most important election of our lives” and “Now is not the time” and “When we win we can do [insert obvious thing that desperately needs to happen]”

      People buy the lies, vote for their corporate appointed vanguard candidate. Then realize they were lied to. That “The Right Time” was never going to happen. They get jaded or just check completely out of politics after the Xth election of being lied to. And its always on those people to “Save Democracy” every election. The lies and shit policies are entirely blameless. Its always the fault of those who question.

      I for instance according to liberals am an EVIL Trump voter. Even though I haven’t voted since 2016 and wont vote until dems make universal healthcare happen. That’s my singular demand currently. But its a hard line. A team of wild horses couldn’t drag me to the polls until that happens. Now I will never vote for republicans. They’re evil. Period. They’re a known quantity. They will only ever do the worst possible thing. List of options, they will 100% choose the one that harms the greatest number of people, their own included. I demand the Democrats be better, which makes me a heinous villain of the highest order.

      • @penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I like your view on this. This is basically how I do and look at it, but this time I had to make an exception, because Trump is actually horrible and I can’t just sit it out even thought I hate the Democrats just as much as the Republicans. This time, I will have to fall for this fear mongering because, again, Trump is horrible and can’t be elected again. Next election when he fucks off, I’m sitting out until my demands are met.

        • @RangerJosie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Good on you. That tiniest expression of your own individual agency makes all the difference in the world. Ultimately we on an individual are powerless in this system. Utterly so. That you can claw back even that much choice is a wonderful thing.

  • @someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    108
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Abstaining or voting 3rd party to “make Dems listen” doesn’t work. If anyone thinks they can play Mexican Standoff, you can’t because the Dems have an out: the center voter. Every time they lose, they go to the center to find voters.

    And remember they need all 3 of presidency, house of representatives, and senate to pass pretty much anything. If they don’t have all 3 they will go to the center to find voters. Some people call this rachet effect, but really they’re looking for voters. Want them to stop ‘racheting’? Then give them consistent and overwhelming victories.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And remember they need all 3 of presidency, house of representatives, and senate to pass pretty much anything

      The odds of Democrats keeping the Senate seem dismal. So it sounds like we’re giving the party license to do nothing for another two years

      • @someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        202 months ago

        I like how you twist that to “party license”. If the people voters vote that way, that is the will of the people voters. Don’t like it? Vote. For Dems. (Though the GOP bear some responsibility being obstructionist pos.)

        • @UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          302 months ago

          If the people voters vote that way, that is the will of the people voters.

          Sorry 50M Californians, but 40k West Virginians decided to go a different way. Guess this means no civil rights for another two years.

          • @someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            17
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            This is aimed at those people that think not voting or voting 3rd party is effective to “make Dems listen”. It is not. Voters have a say.

            • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Dems are a coalition. Centrists are not powerful enough within that coalition to act like utterly unaccountable god-kings. If that needs to be beaten into them then so be it.

              • @someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                32 months ago

                Lol I assume you mean that you (the leftist) will beat some message into the Dems. Dude, you will not win this Mexican Standoff because the Dems have an out: The center voter. Who, wait for it, actually shows up.

                Alll your “beating” is beating yourself when you hand the overton window over to the GOP. It’s the biggest self own in history.

          • @Soup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            62 months ago

            So give up? Yea, it fucking sucks and is unfair as hell but voting is too easy to claim a lack motivation. It’s not a sustained effort, it’s something happens incredibly rarely and you can definitely handle. You can even mail that shit in in most places.

            If you vote then it will be hard for the democrats to win and start shifting your countries policies to leftward(even if it’s an inch at a time). If you don’t vote then it will be impossible to do it.

      • @someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        24
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything. They’ve had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years. Or 6 of the last 32 years. Or 6 of the last 44 fucking years.

        • @MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          182 months ago

          They’ve had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years

          It was significantly shorter than that when you consider Senate control to be 60, which is what’s needed to bypass the fillibuster.

        • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything.

          Thats not how politics works buddy. If what you said were true neither the dems or republicans would have passed any bills in the history of the “republic”. Clearly theres also horse trading, and bribery/lobbying you are pretending dont exist in order to make this weak point.

          • madjo
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            With the obstructionist MAGA caucus in your government that would rather vote no to bipartisan bills because it would give a Democrat a win, barely any bills get passed!

      • @RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 months ago

        This is an incorrect framing of the situation. You aren’t being asked for a Yes/No vote on Democrats. You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans. Or for this election, if you prefer Democracy or Fascism. If you vote “no preference”, that does not communicate “I prefer the Democrats, but want them to move further left”, either logically or politically.

        There are lots of ways to communicate desired policy changes: letter-writing, primaries (including campaigning/funding for candidates), protests, marches, press, social-media, etc. Voting against your interest is not one of them.

        • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans.

          I understand why you’d say this. But you arent trying to understand why people are trying to pressure the dem leadership to be better.

          • @RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            I absolutely understand the anger at the Democratic party. I mention several useful activities to work toward fixing its many failings. The Republican party is strictly worse. Giving equal support to both is counterproductive.

        • @leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          242 months ago

          Democrats move further right to get votes from the center but when they win it’ll go left trust me bro

          • @someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            20
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            They go to the center when they lose. If they don’t lose, they don’t need to go to the center to find voters. You can see my other comment, they’ve only had all 3 houses for 4 out of the last 24 years.

            • @leftytighty@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 months ago

              It’s the left’s fault for not feeling motivated to vote for a center-right party, they’ll become even more right if we don’t vote for them. Progressive candidates are dumb and unpopular.

              • @someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                102 months ago

                I honestly don’t know what point you’re trying to get at. In any case, if the left wants to be effective, they have to vote for Dems. Because, again, when they lose they go to the center to find voters.

                • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  4
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Coalitions dont work if the larger group demands unconditional loyalty or ignores their coalition partners non negotiables. Dems are a coalition of various groups that cant win alone.

                  actively enabling Genocide is a non negotiable for progressives. And progressives are the difference between dems winning and dems losing.

                  Centrist dems have been trying to hold the entire party hostage to trumps evil so they can take AIPACS dirty bribes. So now progressives will play the exact same hostage games. We’ll all go over the cliff into the bloody abyss together, or a few simple policy changes can be made. So get those changes done and lets win this election together. Or dont and our country is over. You choose. We already made our choice, and it was really no choice to be made at all. We were never going to lift a finger to enable genocide, its not who we are.

              • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                So stay home/throw away your vote, I’m sure they’ll realize their mistake and go to the left any decade now to chase those reliable voters.

                • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  And you throw away yours as well. We all lose. Finally a ‘together’ outcome where we are all on the same side and not just taking centrist far-right marching orders like slaves.

            • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              you totally ignore that the Dems could simply represent the will of their constituents and not lose, and not need to “look for votes” outside the boundaries of their party. Kamala would be coasting to vicotry if she wasnt supporting Bidens dirty far right war. She is trying hard to not represent the Dems and take a far right stand on this, and thats the root of this problem. Not Progressive voters or the youth.

        • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          I dont think thats true all the time. as we have seen with Biden, If a dem president is a centrist or far right for a dem, it shifts the entire party and the judiciary rightward. These things have monentum.

          So I’d say its not simply the “D” that matters in overton shift. It also sets the topics in the political conversation, and either strengthens the party for the next election or leaves it in shattered and misaligned, like we are now about the unpopular far right wing genocide being pushed by a democratic US presidential administration.

    • Karyoplasma
      link
      fedilink
      152 months ago

      I’ve thought about that recently.

      In Germany, the 2 historically biggest parties were SPD (used to be liberal-democrat) and CDU (conservative) and they often were the ones tugging it out while the smaller parties were filling in as coalition partners for one or the other.

      Over time, the SPD splintered into several semi-big offshoot parties (Linke, for example) while the CDU stayed as a whole. As a result, CDU is now commonly a favorite for getting most votes in an election.

      Is that consistent with politics across the globe? And if, why do liberal or center parties tend to split up more than conservatives?

      • @kitnaht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        372 months ago

        Because conservatives gravitate towards authority, and progressives are looking to break the status quo.

        So conservatives value order, authority, and it causes them to fall in line.

        Progressives are looking to break that order, believing that things can be better than they are right now. That causes them to infight more often.

      • @someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I commonly hear the left is a loose coalition of factions (which can split apart), while the right fall in line. I think there are fewer factions on the right, or the factions are not as far apart, so coming together is easier. They also unite in absolute hatred of the left, so will fall in line to slay that beast.

        • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          100% agreed regarding coalitions, unfortunately centrists dont seem to know they are in a coalition, or that the party even has a platform. They are so spooked by trump that they will do or say anything to win. Anything.

          Centrists on this thread today accuse Progressives of being members of the far right as a ploy to hide the fact that they are the ones pushing far right policies themselves. The centrists are much closer to being republicans anymore than they are to adhering to the traditional democratic party platform. Real Democrats wouldnt risk the drinking water of the whole continent to enable more fracking to big oil company donations. They wouldnt be ok with more school shootings to pander to the NRA donations (especially when the NRA is heavily infiltrated by Russia). And they wouldnt sponsor and enable a far rightwing genocidal war in the middle east – pitting us against the entire rest of the world-- to draw foreign lobbying donations. But American progressives are somehow willing to swallow every bit of that traitorous behavior except one to get over the finish line together, whereas centrists are willing to change not a single damn thing to win, and proceed to whine and threaten.

      • @PrimeMinisterKeyes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Counterexample: The European Parliament. IMHO, it looks like 4 right-wing groups, 2 left-wing ones and 2 centrist ones. While the exact positioning could be argued over, the right wing is quite certainly more fragmented than the left is.

    • @LotrOrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      102 months ago

      And in their trips to the centre they keep seeming to forget that they keep shifting further and further right

      Centrists are a curse here

      • @someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They. Are. Looking. For. Voters.

        If the people voters want more right, then that’s the will of the people voters. Thus the message: If you, as a leftist, want them to go left then you have to vote for Dems.

        • NoIWontPickAName
          link
          fedilink
          92 months ago

          See you have this backwards, they are supposed to change and then they are rewarded with votes.

          If you vote them in before they change, they have no reason to change.

          • @someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            We can go through the whole history if you want. Every time the Dems go left, they lose. Every single time. So they go to the center to find voters. Then certain people whine “Why are they going center!!! We won’t vote for them!!! Rachet!!” That’s when I say playing Mexican Standoff won’t work. Because they have an out and you don’t. If you want them to stop going center, they have to win first. Because, again, when they lose they go to the center to find voters.

              • @someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                22 months ago

                See my other comment. Oh you did and all you can say is “biased”. Think about it? They have 44 years of history beaten into them. They lose every single time they go left.

            • NoIWontPickAName
              link
              fedilink
              22 months ago

              You don’t reward people when they do things that you don’t want.

              Cause: Politicians do the correct thing.

              Effect: voters reward them.

              • @someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                3
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Very good choice NoIWontPickAName, we can go over the history of how the left doesn’t show up!

                Ok let’s go through this chronologically.

                Carter: Tried to do some left things and got fucking yeeted from office. Aka the left never shows up.

                Bill Clinton: After successive Dem losses Bill figured out “it’s the economy stupid”, aka center policy, not leftist policy. Plus when you run against an incumbent (Bush senior) you generally run from the center. So that’s what he did. And he won.

                Gore: After the population hopefully warmed up with Bill Clinton, he stuck his head out left with climate change. And bam he lost the election. Thanks 3rd party protest voters! Aka: The left never shows up.

                Obama: So guess what Obama learned? Don’t stick your head out. He ran on vague “hope”, hoping the ambiguity would be enough considering Bush’s disastrous wars. And he won.

                More on Obama: so he enacted the ACA. That’s great, right? The thanks Obama got for that was to lose the House of Representatives for year 3 and 4. And lose the House of reps again for years 5 and 6. And then lose both the House of reps and the Senate for years 7 and 8. He enacted left policy and: The left never shows up.

                Hillary Clinton: So what did Hillary learn from the last 6 years of Obama? She learned that the left never shows up. So she ran a mostly center platform to get voters, BUT with a big position to left on the map room to climate change. She basically declared war on climate change. You know that big existential issue that all the leftists care about, right? The big important issue that the left says they will show up for, right? And guess what happened? Bam she lost. Thanks protest non-voters! Aka: The left never shows up.

                Biden: Just like Obama learned from Gore, Biden learned from Hillary that you don’t stick your head out left on anything. Not one thing. And he was running against an incumbent, so once again when you do that you run center. And he won.

                More on Biden: But did left things anyway. He Biden did green energy, EVs, drug price control, PACT act, etc. And what were the results? Lost the House of Representatives for years 3 and 4. Polls showed him losing the election to Trump. He enacted left policy and: The left didn’t show up for midterms, and was not going to show up for the next election.

                Harris: So guess what Harris is doing? She’s adopting Obama’s tactic to run on vague “get ahead” and having energy. From what I know she’s not announced anything left, other than vague tax the billionaires. She has no reason to think the left will ever show up.

                And people are amazed that they don’t run a big left platform? Every time they stick their head left they lose. Every Single Time. And the next guy learns to go to the center to win. Because the center voters actually show up.

                With this history, you’d be an absolute fool to cater to and rely on the left. Because. They. Never. Show. Up.

                So how do you get them to move left? By giving them victories first. Consistent and overwhelming victories. Show them it’s safe to take policy chances. Because when they lose, like they’ve lost 20 years out of the last 24 years, they will go to the center to find votes.

                And some follow up thoughts:

                1. Ok. Then you don’t get to complain how the dems move to the center, or racheting, or anything else. You know, to the voters that actually show up.

                2. This is about the Overton Window. You want the overton window to move? Then you have to vote for Dems. Waiting for this magical left platform isn’t going to happen.

                3. You reallllllllyyyyy don’t want to take the point that this is not a game of Mexican Standoff that you can win. They have an out. You do not. And their out, the center voter, actually shows up.

        • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          They. Are. Looking. For. Voters.

          Thats. Not. What.They. Are. Doing. At All. Progressive votes and the election win are right there for the taking. All the centrists need to do is stop shipping those weapons. Im not even demanding that Kamala stop pushing fracking and gun proliferation thats murdering our children. Progressives are bending over backwards to try to make this work and they are being offered exactly nothing except threats,condescenscion, far right policies, and hostage taking talk by the centrists.

            • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              42 months ago

              Wow another message from you. Dude, I have 6 messages all from you.

              Thats pretty rich coming from you. Almost every other comment on this thread is you. “Dude”.

              • @someguy3@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Why yes I made a top level comment to the post and I am responding to people that reply to me. That is not what you portray it as, so that tells me you’re here in horribly bad faith. Ciao.

    • @Wiz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      102 months ago

      I live in a red state, and the Democratic Party cannot even get enough warm bodies to ruin for every office here. The Libertarians do better with their candidates than the Democrats.

    • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      so you think if we vote for them no matter what they do, they will start representing our wishes out of the goodness of their hearts, instead of Aipac’s who come to them with palletloads of cash? Thats… an interesting theory.

      • @someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        First, again, they go to the center when they lose. If they don’t lose, they don’t need to go to the center to find voters.

        Second: They will do what people voters want. That is the whole point, voters. Right now the voters are voting for brutally slow progress. That’s what they get when they give Dems control of all 3 for only 4 years every 24 years. Want faster progress? Then be the voters that vote for faster progress by giving Dems consistent and overwhelming victories.

        In addition to that, I really think Dems want left policy. They do it when they can despite it costing them elections. According to your logic they would never have done the ACA, or green energy, or EVs, or union empowerment (inb4), or student debt forgiveness, or Chips act, or Pact act, etc, etc. But they did, and it cost them.

  • @LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1022 months ago

    Not an American, but yikes does this have “Vote with us… Or else!” vibes.

    That’s not to say I support Trump, but I personally don’t think this is the way to convince fence-sitters at all.

    • @twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      372 months ago

      And it’s crazy how normal Americans think this two party system is. It’s like no matter how bad you think your guy is, you have to vote for them because the other side is worse. They always talk about the Labour Party and the Tories as if they think they’re carbon copies of the Democrats and the Republicans and project all their issues into them. They don’t seem to realise there’s like five or six other parties that get a considerable number of votes and have representation in Parliament.

      • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 months ago

        It is normal in FPTP voting systems. If you are going to vote in a national election in a FPTP system. Especially one with our electoral college system. But aren’t looking to explicitly throw your vote away. And you aren’t okay with open fascists winning. When things are this close. Yeah there really is no conscionable choice. Unless you happen to live in a state so safe your vote truly could never matter. Like california. Which even that would be unwise. And is especially at a place for anyone from there to tell people elsewhere how to vote. Since they don’t have the same privilege.

        • @sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This is dishonest. You put all the onus of losing to trump on progressives and act powerless, when Kamala changing just one policy would guanatee progressive support in large numbers. We’re not buying it. She’s the one advocating a policy that has no place in a democratic party platform, and would be extreme and risky even for a far right republican platform.

    • Bibliotectress
      link
      fedilink
      222 months ago

      But it’s literally how it works in the USA with voting. It shouldn’t, but it DOES.

    • @axx@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      202 months ago

      Entirely agree. The people responsible for trump getting votes are the people voting for Trump.

      Tactical voting is bullshit of the highest order and the undeniable sign of a fucked up political and voting system, not some sort of political astuteness.

      If your voting system can’t allow people to express their true choice, you should throw it away. Yes, that means the majority of voting systems around the world are bad and need to be changed. Getting people to recognise that this is even an issue in the first place is a huge battle.

      • @Grebes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        Only one party has implemented ranked choice while the other has fought against it. That would be a great first start.

        • @Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          102 months ago

          That’s not quite the case. Ranked choice voting is resisted by whichever party has a comfortable majority in any given state where it is on the ballot. That’s why it failed when it was on the ballot in Massachusetts during the previous presidential election, because it is a reliably blue state and ranked choice voting would only serve to disrupt that status quo.

          I still voted in favor of it, but that’s how it went down.

      • @dmMeYourNudes@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        Yes first past the post elections are fucked, but that’s still the system we have and the one you have to operate under. If you refuse to vote against hitler because you don’t like the voting system, you still refuse to vote against hitler.

    • @ProIsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      162 months ago

      I mean, yeah? Have you looked around? The or else is getting pretty bad.

      Also I want to keep adding it’s not just Trump, he’s just a pawn. This is Republicans, not Trump. If row did anything hopefully it opened up some eyes to realize they have been on message for a long damn time. Dems should take note.

    • @rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      152 months ago

      It’s exactly the kind of thing that feels good to say, but doesn’t convince anyone at all. Which is why Republicans keep winning despite ideas that should be extremely unpopular. They tie themselves to emotions about masculinity and patriotism and paint the other side as a source of disgust and fear. While Democrats look at people who support or don’t seem eager to stop Trump and say angry things at them, which just makes them not want to help Demcorats.

      The “I’m voting, are you?” argument featuring nutty alt-right Maga crazies is far better because it says “hey, you can help stop this nutjob.”

    • @daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      If I was on the fence this kind of menacing push would make me reaffirm myself into not voting Dems. For real.

      What kind of shitty way of convince anyone is this?

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      102 months ago

      Can confirm, these awful false-equivalences have only further convinced me that liberals will never lift a finger to help anyone.

    • hopesdead
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      I’m not speaking from a place of facts, but I think the sentiment is if you don’t purposefully vote for someone within the two-party system that isn’t Trump, your vote will mathematically be a negative towards votes against Trump.

      Not voting/third-party vote = one less vote against Trump/more possible votes for Trump

    • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      Yes, I understand the sentiment. But the tone is off. Sounding like fascists or Marxist Leninist should be the last thing anyone should be aiming for.

      • Cowbee [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        62 months ago

        More people should be aiming to be Marxists, don’t know why you’re trying to draw an equivalence between Marxists and fascists that doesn’t exist. You should read Blackshirts and Reds, Communists and fascists have served entirely different classes, the fascists served the bourgeoisie while the Marxists served the proletariat, and funded anti-colonial and anti-Imperialist movements the world over (including funding the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine).

  • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    57
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    This is exactly why we need ranked choice voting.

    Winner takes all essentially demoralizes and alienates voters and drives people who agree with each other to fight because they’re trapped in a broken system.

    So instead of fighting the system, it’s easier to just blame other people and alienate more of them against your cause, shooting yourself in the foot with ignorance. It’s kind of disgusting.

    • @Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 months ago

      I’d settle for getting rid of the electoral college at this point. We could’ve had at least 4 years of Al Gore setting us on the right path to avoiding the worst of climate change yet here we are having to put up with a potentially third popular vote upset in recent history.

      • @Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        162 months ago

        Why is it so common to blame the third party vote for democrats losing in 2016? It sounds like if the democrats would take an anti-war stance like the green party does, they would have won most of those votes too?

        Seems more appropriate to expect the party to reflect the population rather than the other way around.

        • @Aqarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          162 months ago

          It’s the Schrodinger’s Tankies. Simultaneously so insignificant as a voting block that it’s a waste of time to appeal to them, and so influential that it’s exclusively their fault when the dems lose.

          • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            102 months ago

            Yeah. This is why some Democrats get called Blue MAGA and I don’t think they get it.

            They treat lefties like the same kinda scapegoat the Republicans treat anyone not white. It’s an easy “other” group that can be considered outside the main group and fighting them is “the good moral duty of the Democratic Party.”

            I sometimes wonder if that division and push for the center-left to be apathetic towards the further left is part of the Russian Psy-op that they are so afraid of cause that’s the only reason I can think of a party like this ignoring their youngest, poorest, or most emotional bases, that courting on the right makes them win.

            • @Aqarius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              102 months ago

              That’s also falling for scapegoats. The call is coming from inside the house, and it has been for over three decades.

              The center is apathetic and hostile to the left because they’re not the left. They’re not courting leftwingers because they don’t want them. They keep reaching across the isle because they fundamentally agree with their basic beliefs. It’s why Sorkin dreams about President Mitt Romney (D). The grand Neoliberal turn is disintegrating, and is being besieged by MAGA from the right and progressives from the left, and both the dems and the GOP are consistently moving right because while they find MAGA brutish and uncouth, they’re appeasable, whereas the demands from the left are fundamentally unacceptable to them.

              • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
                link
                fedilink
                62 months ago

                Oh sure. Just wishful thinking and using the same garbage excuse that I hear whenever a neoliberal doesn’t like what a leftist says and calls them a Russian shill.

                That’s really the most obvious sign they are republicans of the past. They keep trying to use a red scare to ignore bases they don’t like.

          • @Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            I do get the example but it’s definitely hard to quantify how many votes would be lost on the other end by appealing further to the left.

            Centrists make up the majority of the voting block, which is why we’re in the situation we are now where everyone is dancing around this fickle middle group. And yet politics has also somehow never felt so polarized in my adult life, go figure.

          • @Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            Yes she was! Its usually the prime piece of evidence people put up to prove that Jill Stein is working for Putin.

            I think its a bit conspiracy adjacent myself. If there was more concrete proof, I’d accept the picture as supporting evidence but its not great on its own.

            Feel free to disagree though.

          • @YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            Of course they were, but only in the last 60 days before the election.

            The green party forgot about the green party right up until it became useful for the Cheeto fuhrer’s campaign.

      • @SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        Ranked choice is more plausible than removing the EC. Ranked choice already exists in some places and the Dems have a proposal (but are lacking the votes) to implement it for Congress.

        Removing the EC would require a constitutional amendment so 3/4 for the House and Senate and ratified by 3/4 of the states. Or maybe it’s 2/3 for some of those, but either way it needs bipartisan support and why would the GOP remove a system that got their guy elected twice this century?

        There is some kind of interstate compact thing to get around it, but making a huge change to elections via sneaky shenanigans won’t go over well at a time when a lot of doubts about election integrity have been widely promoted. Wrongly promoted, but still, doing sneaky things about elections is a real no-go right now.

    • @Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      82 months ago

      How would we get ranked choice passed using the current two party system though? I can’t imagine politicians voting to give up power in that way.

  • @voldage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    562 months ago

    As non-american I agree you guys should definitely vote Harris, despite Dems being terrible Trump would absolutely be worse on each topic Dems are bad. That being said, rethoric of this post is straight up facist. Using threats of personal consequences for “wrongly” exercising ones right to vote is wild.

  • @AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    552 months ago

    Interesting how everyone blames the people and not the corporate party that doesn’t represent the people. If Democrats are struggling to get leftist votes then I suggest they do things that will make leftists vote for them.

  • @ModestMeme@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    522 months ago

    You wanna change the Democratic Party? Maybe vote more than once every four years. State and local elections have garbage turnouts and this is where right wingers shore up their power (because they ALWATS vote). You need to vote every election, always. You want left leaning Democrats in office? Their careers start small, at the local and state level. Vote for them there and support them as they gain experience and reputation.

    But this griping about the electoral process and lack of choices in a national election is just lazy bullsh*t. Yes, a vote for anyone other than Harris is a vote for Trump at this point.

  • zanyllama52
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 months ago

    Abstaining or voting third party is an exercise of choice. If you want your candidate to win, vote for them, as we all should do.

    Vote for the candidate you support. If you don’t support any, you can choose not to vote.

  • Communist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    512 months ago

    If you have a problem with this line of reasoning then your actual problem is first past the post voting.

    Abolish first past the post voting and you can finally actually vote for things you like, rather than against things you hate, but we’re stuck in first past the post voting, so, you must vote strategically.

  • @VerbFlow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    482 months ago

    I’ll vote Dem, but I am ashamed beyond measure of the Dem party. Despite the public doing all they can to stop Trump, the actual candidates running against Trump are sitting on their asses and refusing to take serious action. This “Blue Wave” is not approval FOR Harris-Walz, but rather DISAPPROVAL for Trump. Dems are ultimately more responsible for fascism in the U.S. than their voters.

    All in all, the entire United States Government is at fault. This is just one reason why I want an independent Cascadia.

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    482 months ago

    If you’re voting for the lesser evil, you are still voting to reduce harm.

    Remember that. You can’t save everyone, but if you save NO ONE that’s on you.

    • @Rhoeri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And every four fucking years of my entire voting lifetime is an influx of ignorant pseudo-intellectual blowhard nonsense about third parties that- similar to their devoted followers…. don’t do jack shit between elections.

      I want to go live with the fucking socialist Linux penguins in Antarctica.

      Please do.

        • @freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          24
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          2000 Presidential Election, Florida

          GEORGE W. BUSH: 2,912,790 votes

          AL GORE: 2,912,253 votes

          RALPH GREEN PARTY NADER: 97,488 votes

          That’s where the Green Party gave us Bush, Cheney and the Neo-cons. Thanks for playing.

          • @ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            21
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            So, you’re mad because your candidate wasn’t good enough to win over that many votes, and so you blame the party they did vote for for being better?

          • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            172 months ago

            Its a false logic to think you can just add those votes to the person you like because you think if they had their choice taken away they would agree with you.

            There are literal people that raged violence against the poll workers and right wing lawyers that managed to convince a state to not do its duties and those people you can and should be mad at.

            All Gore even dropped before he should have and was part of the argument used against him trying to get a recount because he wanted to be “respectful”.

            This answer is just easier blame cause they are easier to feel like you can win against them in a fight compared to the wider corruption.

        • @Rhoeri@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Neat!

          Did you ask the person I responded to to show on your little doll where the liberals hurt them?

          Because in a perfect little make-believe socialist society, we’re ALL equal, right?

          So show that equality! Come on now. Don’t be shy. Be the change you want to see!!!

  • Cowbee [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    412 months ago

    No, the blame lies squarely on the DNC for deliberately ignoring the loud and clear message from third party voters that genocide is a red line in the sand. The blame further lies with the liberals supporting a decaying Empire and never lifting a finger to help anyone, just showing up at the ballot box every 4 years while the US commits manmade horrors beyond comprehension.

    Join an org, like the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) or Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO), this mess can’t be undone by supporting the Dems harder.

  • Lux
    link
    fedilink
    382 months ago

    This is false

    Every county in my state always votes red. Due to the way elections are held in this country, it does not matter how I vote. I could vote for Harris, on the tiny chance that enough others will as well, or I could vote 3rd party, and at least increase the percentage of voters doing that so that it doesnt seem as useless next time. Hell, I could vote for trump and there would still be no difference.

    Don’t alienate your allies if you want them to stay allies

    • @ModestMeme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      202 months ago

      Not every “red state” has enough blue people in it to flip, but voter turnout is absolutely the issue in most states. You wanna vote third party and feel connected to some little clique, fine. But don’t expect the Democrats, or the country, to ever change for you. Make your vote valuable.

      • sunzu2
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        You wanna vote third party and feel connected to some little clique, fine.

        🤡