• TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      1 year ago

      That instance’s mods blocked me this morning lol.

      The amount of people simping for Russia in that other thread is insane. Apparently calling Ukraine a country of Nazis is fine, but saying Russia is a dictatorship is not lmao.

      If you see a tankie or pro Russia comment, 99% of the time it’s a lemmy.ml poster

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        yep I got banned from there for simply stating that ukraine has a right to defend themselves after Modi called for “peace”. Apparently absolute pacifism is only required from one side.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This topic has nothing to do with being “pro-Russian” instead its being pro-individualist and pro-open source

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m pro open source, which is why I don’t want the Russian government interfering with it for their own geopolitical bullshit.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree, but people aren’t their government. Discriminating based on nationality is xenophobia.

            • khorak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              1 year ago

              Did you miss the fact that it’s not a blanket ban on Russians? If you work for a sanctioned company, then I’m sorry but you are out. Missed the chance to jump ship in the last twenty years of Putin turning Russia into a dictatorship? Well, I hope you like being sent to your death. Sad times, but let’s not pretend that this is discrimination.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                From what I saw in the executive order it wasn’t limited to just sanctioned companies. Linus and other maintainers haven’t come out with which specific sanction they’re talking about so its just speculation

            • YeetPics@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I heard Russia is full of Nazis, and if that level of hearsay is fine for staging a multi year invasion and destroying a thousand years of history it’s just FINE for segregating bad-actors and persona non grata.

              Can’t deal with it? Move to a less shitty company not sanctioned by scumbags. Or even a less tribal country 🤷

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I heard Russia is full of Nazis, and if that level of hearsay is fine for staging a multi year invasion and destroying a thousand years of history it’s just FINE for segregating bad-actors and persona non grata.

                Linux maintainers aren’t invading Ukraine

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yesterday I accidentally commented in .ml and mentioned that voting third party in our current voting system is playing with fire to get a worse candidate in office. I was told I must therefore start a grassroots movement for ranked choice voting, because apparently I can’t have an opinion without a movement.

      Normally I let a few downvotes get under my skin more than I care to admit, but in this setting it was kind of a badge of honor. Honestly it was kind of “fun” to see what people were saying.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope people do not do that and take into account this campaign against lemmy.ml. I am aware of the accusations against the admins of this instance, but I practically never see here this kind of brigading, campaigning against whole instances like lemmy.world. Sure, I myself did make a bad comment or two about lemmy.world out of >800 comments, but that’s normal. I think the fair thing to do, is to respond in the same scale (i. e. blocking specific users) instead of going all ballistic with instance blocks.

      I’d also like an option to just block/hide the instance part of user names. I don’t like what this bit of information is doing to discussions in Lemmy.

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could also just move instances if you don’t want to be blocked. Hexbear, and ML are hot spots for the worst kind of people.

        • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I know I can. Being blocked is something I do not have any issues with. My comment was merely my point of view. If someone is being actively bothered by the admins of the instance I’m in, it’s completely fair to block it. However, to block whole instances for ideological differences is kind of immature.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t like what this bit of information is doing to discussions in Lemmy.

        Cool. That’s fine that you don’t like it. However people have a right to not see what they don’t want to see. If they decide that means it’s lemmy.ml, then that’s their right.

        Just like I have a right to not peer with lemmy.ml if I didn’t want to.

        Hell I have a hard block on ALL Russian and Chinese IP addresses. Not because I have something against the people. But I just don’t want to deal with the headache of accepting traffic from those countries.

        Just because some (or even a majority) of the people on lemmy.ml are fine to interact with doesn’t mean that there isn’t contention from other users and admins on that instance.

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think the fair thing to do, is to respond in the same scale (i. e. blocking specific users) instead of going all ballistic with instance blocks.

        it’s not just random users, the mods of larger communities like !worldnews@lemmy.ml will delete your comments and ban you simply for disagreeing with them.

        • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For this, some people proposed to move the community from one instance to another. Now, it seems to me like the incentive to comment on instances ideologically biased for people who cares about the voting system is basically to troll the opposing instance. Which leads to this petty battle that I will ignore from now on.

          EDIT: It’s also interesting to note that lemmy.ml is not like any other instance. In fact, it would be beneficial to not have big communities here. My account is here because it’s an old account, but lemmy.ml should be more like a “testing” instance, and they probably shouldn’t be signing up more people. The admins and devs acknowledge this from time to time. So, I guess everyone wins with this.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is about open-source being open. I’m a very non-tankie, and I think this is bad- though a bit better if its only people working for sanctioned companies.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Go look at the principles of open-source or free software as defined either by the OSI and the FSF and then come back when you find the one that says that Linus needs to violate US sanctions to keep employees of Russian companies in trusted roles within his project.

        Also, what does this have to do with being tankie or not? Modern Russia is very openly not communist.

        • aidan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          .ml is full of tankies. Also, nothing in open-source principles say that to my knowledge. Am I not allowed to have beliefs not explicitly defined by the OSI?

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The OSI’s definition of open-source software is the de facto definition used by most people, and for most of the remaining people that don’t, they (mistakenly, because they define “free” software, not “open-source”) defer to the FSF’s defintion of free software.

            So yes, you should be explicitly noting that what you define as “open” has nothing at all to do with the far-and-away most widely used definition(s) of “open-source”.

            • aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, and I said I want open-source to be open. As in not just open-source, but also open to all. That is my personal moral value, and I advocate for that. What the OSI supports has nothing to do with that.

              • Saryn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I want a lot of things too, but what I want most of all is to live in a society governed by the rule of law. There are no absolute rights - limiting the freedoms of people who are complicit in crimes or enable them is how we protect the rights of everyone else. Simple as.

                • aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Limiting the freedoms of innocent people who happen to live in a country doesn’t protect the rights of others.

                  • Saryn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The limitations didn’t target a nationality, they targetted sanctioned entities. And you know this because it has been made clear throughout this thread, including in numerous replies to your own comments. So you are demonstrably and obviously disingenious, not engaging in good faith or have yourself been misled. This behavior logically leads people to the conclusion that you are either being deliberately manipulative or you are confused and have been deliberately manipulated. Sadly, the end result is the same in both cases and regardless of your intention.

                    I wish you the best. We should all be a lot more dedicated to intellectual honesty.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would encourage that, but if your instance doesn’t defederate them you may have to go a bit farther since you’ll still get replies from lemmy.ml users, as users are not blocked as part of this functionality. And that is by design, it’s not meant to act as a replacement or alternative to defederation, it’s meant to act as an alternative to blocking all communities on an instance.