cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/20091173

I’ve been waiting until after Christmas day to make this post, but some of our communities recently have had a lot of noise and upset over someone that uses neopronouns that most people are unfamiliar with.

So I want to make this clear. A persons pronouns are to be respected. This is true when the user is using neopronouns that you’re unfamiliar with. It’s true even if you think someone is trolling. Pronouns are not rewards for good behaviour. They aren’t only to be respected when you like the person you’re interacting with, or if their pronouns “make sense” to you. Trolls, spammers, twitter users, it doesn’t matter who they are, your options are to respect their pronouns, or to not engage with them.

I really want to re-iterate the importance of this. Gender diverse folk are undermined, invalidated and questioned at every step of our lives. As a community, we need to be working to undo that, not creating more of it, and that means there is no space for treating pronouns (including neopronouns) as a reward for good behaviour.

This isn’t a free reign for trolls and spammers. The rules still apply. Trolling, spamming, etc will continue to be dealt with, but it’s not an excuse to act as if respecting someones pronouns is optional.

    • Julian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      343 months ago

      A lot of people say the same things about trans folks in terms of gay rights. Some people might be fucking around, but drawing a line in the sand like that is going to inevitably invalidate people with legitimate identities. And if you really don’t want to use them, it’s super easy to just ignore. Idk if I’ve ever even had to refer to someone with third person pronouns on Lemmy.

      • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        273 months ago

        Some people might be fucking around, but drawing a line in the sand like that is going to inevitably invalidate people with legitimate identities.

        All concepts are just lines in the sand, even down into STEM. Lines have to be drawn somewhere. The question is whether the new line drawn or erased disrupts other lines, who it benefits, and what it’s worth. I happen to have a very low opinion of the idea that gender is entirely arbitrary and without any line in the sand, and that “I identify as an attack helicopter” is not a conservative defamation of the trans and NB community, but a legitimate point of view.

        And if you really don’t want to use them, it’s super easy to just ignore.

        The commenter was removed and banned for disagreeing with the concept that dragonfucker is a gender. On the meta comm for the instance. Under a post by the main admin.

        Idk if I’ve ever even had to refer to someone with third person pronouns on Lemmy.

        Dragonfucker has been banned from a number of communities for insisting on just that.

        • @Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          8
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          the human brain is good enough of a prediction machine to not need a clean linear line in the sand imo, I’d like to believe that our judgement ability is closer to a support vector machine than a simple one dimensional ‘greater than’ statement

          e.g. you’d know if someone was actually identifying as an attack helicopter as opposed to trolling by saying so, right? maybe it’s just a phase for them but people have phases (imo) because they need to probe and gather first hand experience to learn

          • @klemptor@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            253 months ago

            you’d know if someone was actually identifying as an attack helicopter as opposed to trolling by saying so, right?

            IRL maybe, but the issue here is that (at least from what I’ve observed) dragonfucker can be pretty confrontational, as if seeking a fight. It’s obnoxious behavior and generally I roll my eyes and move along. I do think identifying as a “dragonfucker” for gender is hard to take as anything other than a long-running troll job, particularly because 1) dragons aren’t real and even if they were, 2) “dragonfucker” is surely a hobby or job description, not a gender. Most reasonable people would find this ludicrous at first glance, and have their opinion confirmed by this user’s strident tone and eagerness to take offense. It seems really unlikely that this person sincerely identifies as a dragonfucker (and honestly I can’t even believe we’re having this debate).

            I really try to be balanced and understanding, but this user in particular seems to seek negative attention. Which is fine I guess, but I feel bad for anyone who falls into that trap.

            • @prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              133 months ago

              Exactly, well said. And all it does is make a mockery of people experiencing real issues with gender uncertainty/fluidity.

        • Julian
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I thought the post was about neopronouns in general. Didn’t know the drag example was the main concern and thought it was just an exaggerated example.

      • @shani66@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        4
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Even if we take the person pug is talking about at face value (which, frankly, we shouldn’t for them in particular), it’s not a gender identity. It’s just an identity. We don’t have a pronoun for every granular identity under the sun, so it’s weird we accept that some people feel the need to have totally unique ones, which goes against the point of pronouns to begin with.

        That said, being referred to in the third person would actually be fine imo, but I’ve been primed for that by being a weeb.

    • @MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      193 months ago

      That might’ve gone over better if it didn’t read like an angry rant against “idiots”/“adult children”/“spoiled little shits”

      • @PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        223 months ago

        If it was banned for incivility, that would have been one thing. But it was banned for ‘gatekeeping’. Writing on the wall, and all that jazz.

    • @CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      103 months ago

      You don’t have to refer to them at all, just block obvious troll accounts. It’s not like you’re going to shame them into not being a troll.

    • @shapesandstuff@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      93 months ago

      Seems mostly ok to kick someone for being rude and directly offending a specific person in their posts, regardless of the opinion voiced.

    • i see the gatekeeping. It’s the same an antiLGBTQ person would say to an LGBTQ… “your pronouns aren’t valid”. So yes. It is gatekeeping. Thank you mods for keeping the area LGBTQ allied!

  • @Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    i don’t mind what people call themselves and I’ll use it to refer to them if I notice it, but they shouldn’t expect their pronoun to be understood if it’s something obscure

      • @pack_of_racoons@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 months ago

        I don’t like the idea either. If true, it seems like the mods/community are upset they can’t feed trolls, or bully people who aren’t the “right” type of queer.

    • @yuri@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      i have .world straight up blocked. when the man or bear thing happened EVERY shitty post/poster came from there. and watching pugjesus throw their little shitfit has only cemented that decision.

      hilariously i’ve had way better interactions with .ml users, so i guess if the migration does happen i’ll just hang out there. i’d much rather dodge politics than thinly-veiled-to-outright misogyny and casual transphobia lmao

      • I promise I’m not stalking you, I think we’re just following the same journey and comment progression!

        I block/unblock .world as I appreciate the content but the drama:person ratio can get really high. It’s mostly thanks to a small number of chronically online people who enjoy throwing fuel on the fire and leading a crusade to defederate and/or brigade whichever instance whenever there’s a hot button topic. This seems to gather and focus otherwise aimless “not nice people”, á la the man vs bear scenario.

  • @Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    When talking about someone, is using the commonly accepted neutral “they” allowed, or is it considered non-tolerable misgendering?

    • qaz
      shield
      M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s fine by me, but I’m not sure how other moderators (or admins) feel about it

      • @Deestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        333 months ago

        Not personally affected, but I saw someone instantly permabanned with reason “misgendering” for a comment talking about “drag”'s behavior but using “they”.

        Not warned. Not comment deleted with “please use pronoun at all times”. Just bam.

        If the general stance is that reaction can be “up to the admin”, that’s a bit… minefield-y.

        • qaz
          shield
          M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          If the general stance is that reaction can be “up to the admin”, that’s a bit… minefield-y.

          I understand that this might seem problematic. We (the mods of 196) are only partially in control of what is removed and who is banned, due it being hosted on blahaj.zone.

        • Ada
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          but I saw someone instantly permabanned with reason “misgendering” for a comment talking about “drag”'s behavior but using “they”.

          No you didn’t

          • @Deestan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Why are you saying that?

            Just shitting on a discussion like that adds nothing.

            Or if you do know the comment in question I was referring to and I missed some context that wasn’t visible in the modlog, please let me know.

            • Ada
              link
              fedilink
              73 months ago

              I’m saying that, because I’m the instance admin, and I don’t permanently instance ban people for a singular comment using “they” in regards to someone who is explicitly ok with they…

              I have no idea which comment you were referring to, but I do know that your representation of what you saw is not what actually happened…

    • missingno
      link
      fedilink
      243 months ago

      It’s a useful feature of language for ‘they’ to be a valid default you should always be able to fall back on.

      I don’t even know who any of you are on Lemmy, and I don’t care to. I’m rarely ever even paying attention to your names to begin with.

      • @klemptor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        213 months ago

        This is a big part of it, to be honest. Dragonfucker eagerly takes offense when people don’t use the “drag” pronoun, but most of the time users aren’t even looking at handles, and just defaulting to “they” as a general-use pronoun.

    • Ada
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      It depends on the person. If the pronouns you are using for someone is upsetting them and they make that clear, don’t keep using them. If the only pronouns you can use make you uncomfortable, then simply don’t interact with the person in question. And if the person in question is trolling or otherwise misbehaving, report them without doing so in a way that ignores their pronouns.

  • CreatingMachines
    link
    fedilink
    173 months ago

    Wow…looking at these comments, i realise I still have a lot to think about regarding my exact stance on all this…the fact that I have have zero irl exp in this is not helping…

    • Ada
      link
      fedilink
      English
      163 months ago

      Whatever tho, I guess every individual user is supposed to independently block an asshat who tells people to commit suicide,

      The message clearly and categorically states the rules still apply, and that behaviour is what gets actioned. Literally nothing about the post says that someone using neopronouns is otherwise exempt from the rules. If someone is telling someone to kill themselves, report it or DM it to a community mod.

  • Block [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    113 months ago

    Most of the time I don’t ask people their pronouns in public I just tend to use “they/them” until I overhear someone saying their actual pronouns then’ll use them.

    As for here on Lemmy I just look at their pronouns in the bio or just don’t use pronouns at all in my comments.

    I respect everyone and if I make a mistake that’s okay and I’ll refer to them with the correct pronouns.

  • qazM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    I’m seeing a lot of downvotes on this post, if you feel you disagree, feel free to send me a DM.

  • Great! Definitely have my respect for standing up to gatekeeping. Gatekeeping has no place in a trans community. Be who you want. Anyone telling you you can’t should be luigi’d to somewhere more fitting them. Allies not enemies.

  • @lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    63 months ago

    Thank fuck my native language doesn’t have gendered pronouns. I just use they for everything, much simpler that way.

    • max
      link
      fedilink
      83 months ago

      well see i belive in my brain (biological) that im kitty so therefore im still valid in ur terms :3

      (also gender can be independant from anything biological meows)

      • nifty
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I think the binary form of gender is a social construct, but the entire spectrum of gender identity has a biological basis because you can change aspects of people’s gender by affecting them on a physiological basis, like with hormones etc. Identity expression isn’t always related to gender or biology, I think, and it doesn’t have to be.

        Oh, to be clear, just because you believe in something doesn’t mean it has the same biological implications as gender identity. I hope I am not being rude or anything :3

        And yes, you’re a good kitty, Max head pat.

        • @homicidalrobot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          233 months ago

          NP don’t bother me at all, but that user intentionally stirs the shit in myriad other ways. Short account lifetime, TONS of replies, intentionally controversial posts, feels the need to comment on every single post that gets traction. I think “we should be nice to AI because it might be alive” has been my least favorite arc so far, close between that and declaring all of lemmy transphobic (in a BZ post no less). Block drag and move on. This post was proof enough for me personally it was a great choice.

          • qaz
            shield
            M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Aside from all the drama, they also encouraged users to commit suicide (which is why they were banned from trans on blahaj) and used sock puppet accounts. They were banned from 196 2 days ago.

              • qazM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                10
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I copied from another comment using “he” and forget the right pronouns for a second, it’s fixed now.

                (Kinda ironic I forgot, since the whole thing started with their neopronouns 😅)