OK, maybe you wouldn’t pay three grand for a Project DIGITS PC. But what about a $1,000 Blackwell PC from Acer, Asus, or Lenovo?


Besides, why not use native Linux as the primary operating system on this new chip family? Linux, after all, already runs on the Grace Blackwell Superchip. Windows doesn’t. It’s that simple.

Nowadays, Linux runs well with Nvidia chips. Recent benchmarks show that open-source Linux graphic drivers work with Nvidia GPUs as well as its proprietary drivers.

Even Linus Torvalds thinks Nvidia has gotten its open-source and Linux act together. In August 2023, Torvalds said, “Nvidia got much more involved in the kernel. Nvidia went from being on my list of companies who are not good to my list of companies who are doing really good work.”

    • Cris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man, I completely forgot about that. That’s honestly wild to think about in retrospect…

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not. It had nothing to do with it. Nvidia was all in with Linux as soon as they realized their hardware could be used for data processing and AI. That realization was way more than a decade ago.

          • priapus@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            They only open sourced the kernel drivers, which just makes sense for them to do. Userspace drivers, which these attackers wanted to be open, are still very much closed. Likely had nothing to do with it.

              • priapus@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s true, but its still not nvidia making that, so it’s a bit of a different thing. It will never support certain things like CUDA. It is really cool though and wouldve never happened without the open kernel modules.

    • projectmoon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t know about “always.” In recent years, like the past 10 years, definitely. But I remember a time when Nvidia was the only reasonable recommendation for a graphics card on Linux, because Radeon was so bad. This was before Wayland, and probably even before AMD bought ATI. And it was certainly long before the amdgpu drivers existed.

    • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nvidia was “forced” to integrate Linux into its ecosystem

      100% bullcrap.

      Nvidia’s servers for data processing have always run Linux. And you know what those servers run? It’s not Windows, that’s for sure. So why would they write multiple versions of a driver for the same hardware interface? Their servers use the same drivers that you would use for gaming on a Linux desktop system.

      In fact, no version of Windows is supported on their DGX servers, and AFAIK you can’t even install Windows on it (even if you managed, it wouldn’t be usable).

      Long story short, a vendor we were working with (about 6 or 7 years ago now), was working on their Linux version of their SDK. We wanted to do some preliminary testing on Nvidia’s new T4s that at this point were only available via Nvidia’s testing datacenter (which we had access to).

      During a call with some of the Nvidia engineers I had to ask the awkward question of “any chance there’s a Windows server we can test on?”. I knew it was a cringe question and I died a little during the 10 second silence until one of the Nvidia guys finally replied with “no one uses Windows for this stuff”. And he said it slowly like the reply to such a question needed to go slow to be understood, because who else would ask that question unless you’re slow in the head?

      Nvidia has always been hostile to the Linux community or negligent to say the least

      People say “hostile”, but I think a better word is arrogant. They wanted to force the industry to use their own implementations they owned or pioneered like egl-stream instead of open standards. But AMD and Intel have proven that open source graphics drivers not only work, but benefit from being open so that the community can scratch their own itches and fix issues faster.

      • priapus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, Nvidia has never been hostile towards Linux, they benefit from supporting it. They just don’t care to support the desktop that much, and frankly neither do AMD or Intel. They often take an extremely long time to fix simple bugs that only effect desktop usage. Fortunately, in their case, the drivers can be fixed by other open source contributors.

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Am I missing something here? Nvidia never caved to their demands IIRC

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux, after all, already runs on the Grace Blackwell Superchip. Windows doesn’t.

    And why is that?

    Project DIGITS features the new NVIDIA GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip, offering a petaflop of AI computing performance for prototyping, fine-tuning and running large AI models.

    With the Grace Blackwell architecture, enterprises and researchers can prototype, fine-tune and test models on local Project DIGITS systems running Linux-based NVIDIA DGX OS, and then deploy them seamlessly on NVIDIA DGX Cloud™, accelerated cloud instances or data center infrastructure.

    Oh, because it’s not a fucking consumer product. It’s for enterprises that need a cheap supercomputer

    • qaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t care why they got their shit together, I’m happy as long as they fix the open source drivers.

  • Serge Matveenko@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, it’s still a modified custom distro and other distros will need to invest extra effort to be able to run there. So, no actual freedom of choice for users again…

    • sprack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not true. You can run other distros, but it won’t be ready to go without a decent amount of work.

        • sprack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They said there is no freedom of choice. You are free to choose any distro you want. HW mfgs aren’t under obligation to provide inbox support for niche markets.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Folks, I think we got a bot here thats just spewing pre-prepared lines, regardless of how irrelevant the comment is.

            • sprack@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Versus someone that doesn’t understand the market segment this is meant for. People using it for training don’t care about the distro or gfx drivers. It’s an appliance.

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Don’t get too excited – if this goes like the last few NVidia hardware, it will:

    • cost too much
    • run a non-mainline kernel
    • NVidia will discontinue support for it after 3 months

    Go talk to all the Jetson owners out there and see how happy they are with NVidia Linux boxes. I’ll believe it when I see it (and when it is supported for longer than a quarter)

  • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Or you can just buy any random potato computer (or assemble it yourself from stuff you found) and still run Linux on it.

  • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I fucking wish you could filter out words like “Linux” on Lemmy so I don’t have to hear it anymore. I avoid Linux out of spite to all the Linux bros

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m planning on getting new pc soon. I was planning on avoiding nvidia because i had read it might be more difficult to get drivers. Does this mean they are going to improve things in general or just for the newest and likely most expensive stuff? I dont want to buy the newest possible gpu since they always have bloated price for being new and a bit older ones are likely decent enough too.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Modern nvidia GPUs work great, like rtx 900 and newer

      The main problem are nvidia legacy cards where nvidia isn’t updating their proprietary drivers and isn’t making them open source which leads to the decision to go with nuveau on newer kernels which has less features and uses more power, but is wayland compatible.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nvidia drivers on Linux are messy and have been for a long time. It took them ages to fix Vsync in Wayland. If you want to run Linux, go AMD (or Intel).

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was planning on getting some amd gpu. Are there any other components that might have similar issues? I want to build this pc specificially for linux

        • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really, everything else should just work. At least if you don’t plan to buy an obscure USB sound card or something like that 😄

          Have fun!

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Haven’t they been making things like the Jetson AGX for years? I guess this is an announcement of the next generation.

    • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.worksBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a pile of shit compared to any other sbc. It’s difficult to develop or run anything because it has an arm chip

      • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        But arm is the most deployed microprocessor in the world? I’d much rather write arm assembly than Intel or PowerPC. For higher level languages, arm has good compiler support. Can you explain why you don’t like arm? I’m genuinely curious because it is probably my favorite development environment (I mostly write embedded system software).

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is an horrible ecosystem that could very well end the era of the personnal computer. I type this on an arm device which I cannot ever be root on. Arm has been the biggest rollback in user freedom since windows 10.

        • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.worksBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Linux packages don’t work on it unless they’re custom compiled, OS is supplied by Nvidia unless you make or compile your own os, so support for these will be abandoned when the next one comes out. Minimal performance for the price in exchange for lower power consumption. Really only useful for image recognition for OEMs for automated factory quality inspection, robotics, etc. where Internet access is limited.

          • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The AGX that I use has Ubuntu 22.04 lts. I have been able to update it with apt. For us, it has been a good environment for CUDA. We run a rust application that uses c++ cuda image processing on the back end. Sorry people are downvoting you.

  • XNX@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cant load the article. Does it mention if this will be ARM computers?