• Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 year ago

    The only winners in this scenario are governments that want more control over their citizens’ digital lives.

    And that, as the saying goes, is not a bug. It’s a feature.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man I wish European governments would take more control of our digital town squares that are entirely owned and handled by foreign corporations who seek to erode democracy.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Really? Let me try.

        Hong Kong isn’t part of China. Taiwan is an independent country.

        Edit: oh, this community is in lemmy.world, not lemmy.ml. Still, for those disgruntled, report me for rule 2 & 6. I want to see how mods respond to this.

            • rnercle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              19
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              let’s assume that statement is true, let’s take the words of an anonymous internaut for truth :

              CIA paid Taliban too, i remember reading. Does that make Taliban too just propaganda?

              U.S. sponsored and sponsors many movements around the globe as long as their goals align. That money alone can’t invalidate the cause.

              Like, on the contrary, U.S. sponsorship can’t validate a cause either.

              i remember unsubscribing from political communities, why the heck am i responding to this comment at this hour. Completely futile! Will it change your mind? Do i really care what you will think about Tibet tomorrow?

              • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                U.S. sponsored and sponsors many movements around the globe as long as their goals align. That money alone can’t invalidate the cause.

                USSC declares money is speech. You not only agree, but go further that money is truth. Naziism and Islamist fascism is truth. Democracy, and political power, is much cheaper in smaller countries made less stable with US extortion and war. Navalny caught on video soliciting MI6 for funding to destabilize Russia. Hong Kong media mogul fomenting protests because of Americas values.

                The US empire’s values are extortion, control, puppetry, and war whitewashed/described with a facade of liberal freedom. Every country is to be a pawn for the empire to the detriment of their population. The political establishment’s disdain for Americans provides no valid expectation for the empire to promote humanism elsewhere. Just propaganda.

                • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That doesn’t make them propaganda. Tibet exists, I’ve been there. I have friends living there. The CIA paid for places to put listening equipment along China’s border. They did it in Cuba too. Is Castro propaganda?

                  You also deny that the Uyghurs are being disappeared and “reeducated”. The Uyghurs are being treated just like the First Nations people in America were. Their land and customs stand in the way of Chinese “progress”

                  Are you paid by China? Or are you just a useful idiot?

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Tibet emerged as one of countless warlord states in the chaos following the fall of the Qing, it never received international recognition and is recognized as part of China and claimed by the ROC (Taiwan). In the period when it was autonomous, it was ruled by a slaveowning theocracy with an average life expectancy in the 30’s. Whipping, mutilation, and amputation were common punishments and poverty and starvation were rampant, with people frequently having to sell their kids for food. The monks and lamas, meanwhile, lived on the backs of the people in extravagant mansions with thousands of servants.

            “Free Tibet” is essentially just “The South Will Rise Again” with extra steps.

            • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying.

              I am requesting that link in lieu of an image macro

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                For the record, that line is more in reference to people talking about things that allegedly happened on the fediverse, like, “I saw such and such user say X.”

                Here is a detailed account of what Tibet was like with sources. If there’s a specific claim that you’d like me to clarify or back up, I’d be happy to.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The slavery enjoyers are not happy with me, it seems. If only downvotes had the power to change historical facts.

    • Viri4thus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      The same as when Americans posted about the gaza genocide on tik tok, the government cracks down.

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d bet Chinese government WANTS people using these apps. They have established state control for rapid monitoring and data collection and rapid censorship and targeted groups for manipulation and propaganda.

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anyone that knows anything about average TT users knew that if the ban was going to happen, that this was going to happen in some way, shape, or form.

  • DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure Xiao Hong Shu translates to Little Red Note in English. I’m not using it, just clarifying the name to make it seem small / cute. Aduki beans are Xiao hong dou.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s actually just a funny coincidence, though it’s funny when people freak out about it. Mao’s “little red book” is written 红宝书, while the app is 小红书, so the connection is only really there in English. Red is a reference to two institutions the creator was involved with, Stanford Business School and Bain & Company, both of which use red as their main color (I imagine the general association of red with good luck may have factored in as well). As for note vs book, I mean, a notebook is a “little book,” and note is short for notebook (e.g. Death Note).

        If you actually look at the app and what gets posted there and what doesn’t, it’s pretty silly to assume it’s a reference. It was originally called “Hong Kong Shopping Guide” and was targeted towards tourists, the userbase skews female and relatively well off. It’s like Instagram, there’s lots of cat posts and the the like, lots of fashion, I’ve come across some pretty impressive furries, and it’s even got a decent sized queer community, particularly popular with lesbians.

        Even if it were an intentional reference to Mao’s book, like, so what? The users are the ones putting out content and they’re just regular people. Not everything is some sinister plot.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think most people know it too. They protest because they have already got hacked a dozen or two times, advertisers steal all data not locked down, and the government scoops up all of that. So they question “what can China do to me that hasn’t already been done. My data and privacy has already been made worthless”

          • Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I hear a lot of people asking why it matters if someone has their data cause it must be worthless by now.
            I often think the governments wouldn’t be fighting this hard to track people if it was.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What has social media like tiktok or whatever done to improve peoples lives?

    Man, just use Lemmy and stay off those toxic apps. I’ve had multiple people send me tiktok links and guess what, that shit stays unclicked. I want no part of it.

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people have made it their main income. Whether you or I think that’s good or not is irrelevent, but it does mean hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of Americans will lose their jobs as a result of this.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have just as much sympathy for those poor individuals as I would for health insurance employees that would lose their job as a result of U.S. universal healthcare. Well, a little bit more, as they at least made people smile on occasion.