This post is inspired by me seeing an ambulance in the bike lane by the apartment building opposite of mine.

By this point, I’m sure we’ve all had just about enough of anti-urbanists and NIMBYs claiming in bad faith that bike lanes and bus lanes will be obstructive for emergency vehicles, and as such cannot be built.

You’re probably well aware that exactly the opposite is the case - cars are the principal obstruction for emergency vehicles, and emergency vehicles can actually make very efficient use of bike and bus lanes to shorten response times.

I propose that we flip the argument on its head by rebranding bike and bus lanes as Emergency Vehicle-lanes, which just so happen to afford permission to buses and bikes when not in active use by emergency vehicles (which is of course already the case, everyone is required to yield any space to emergency vehicles, at least where I live).

This way, we kill this particular argument against bike and bus lanes in its crib, and expose the opposition as being actually against emergency vehicle mobility, in favour of having more lanes to drive their cars on.

Let me know what you think!

  • Infrapink@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you do that, the cagers will whine “Look at all the cyclists driving their bikes in the lanes set aside for emergency vehicles!”

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Keep it codified that bikes and buses are allowed to use the space, and that specifically only private cars and commercial transport vehicles are prohibited.