Republicans in Congress will try to pass a stopgap spending bill this week to avert a partial government shutdown and keep the government running through September, though they’ll need Democrats’ help to do it.

The 99-page stopgap spending bill, which House Republicans released over the weekend, is required since lawmakers haven’t made any progress conferencing the dozen annual government funding bills that were supposed to become law by Oct. 1.

The continuing resolution, the third since October, would fund the federal government for the rest of fiscal year 2025 — marking the first time since fiscal 2013 that Congress has leaned on stopgap spending bills for the entire year, according to a report from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dems should shut it down … but won’t. They could force Republicans to sign whatever legislation they want, they just need 2 voted to win … but the Dems are weak. We need a better class of liberal politicians.

    • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Democratic representatives make more money in donations when there are more Republicans around making noise …

      We need to fix the way we donate money to candidates 

        • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, all i am saying is that i can take a tax free gift of 100,000 USD per year, but i still have to inform the IRS who gave it to me and when. If I have to do that as a private citizen, politicians should have to do something similar with campaign donations, so i agree

          • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s nothing stopping people of influence (the wealthy, social media influencers, etc.) from endorsing a candidate on their own.

            Nice straw-man. That isn’t what they said at all. They said nothing about endorsements. They are talking about publicly funding elections in influencers. Since you brought it up though, free speech can and is limited when there is a compelling argument that the speech in question is harmful to the public good. Disallowing social media influencers from promoting candidates would no more violate free speech rights than banning churches from doing so does.

        • Wilco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but … the people that would make these changes are the ones that benefit from how they work now. We need another branch of government, one with no power over normal citizens, but able to investigate corruption in politicians.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      We need a better class of liberal politicians.

      That’s called “leftist.”

      • Wilco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, we need democrats that move to the center but avoid the billionaires. Which is basically impossible.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, we need democrats that move to the center

          Correct – to the left of where they are now.

          Seriously: the Democrats are indeed liberal, which is a right-wing economic philosophy, and that’s a big part of the problem. The whole debate over “woke” (social “liberalism”) is nothing but a fucking distraction; the real reason the Democrats are losing is that they refuse to address wealth inequality.

          • Quadhammer@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Liberals are such a boogieman for lemmy Ill never get it. They should be your partner in this but all i see from “leftists” is attempts to sow division

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              They should be your partner in this

              Yeah, they should be! But they’re not, because they’ve decided to learn all the wrong lessons from Harris’ loss and try to appease/collaborate with the fascists instead.

              Meanwhile, the left keeps lining up to kick Liberal Lucy’s football every single time, because in a first-past-the-post two-party system, WTF else are us blockheads gonna do?

              all i see from “leftists” is attempts to sow division

              There are two possible responses to this, depending on exactly what you mean by “sow division:”

              1. If you’re just talking about the tankies and “punish the Democrats and help Trump win because single-issue Gaza” types: you know damn well those aren’t real leftists; you even put in the scare quotes yourself.

              2. If you’re speaking more broadly than that (e.g. if you’re including what I’m saying in this thread) you need to get your head adjusted and learn to recognize that legitimate criticism of Democrats is a thing. You are not entitled to call people making arguments like mine “divisive” when the Jeffries et al. do fuck-all to meaningfully resist fascism and we rightfully complain about it!


              I mean, holy shit, I just got an asinine DNC fundraising email talking about Trump “cutting programs” for his “tax cuts for the rich” and how “the DNC is also working tirelessly to flip the House and the Senate in the next election so we can have a check on Trump in Congress,” as if that fucking even slightly matters compared to the fact that Trump is systematically dismantling America’s democracy itself and there isn’t even going to be a Congress with any meaningful power or a free and fair election for Democratic candidates to even win by then!

              The message is basically “hey rube, send us $50 so we can piss it away on Dog knows what while sitting around bewilderedly asking “what leverage do we have,” unanimously confirming Marco fucking Rubio, and ten of us even stooping to censure Al Green for daring to show even the tiniest amount of resistance.”

              If somebody thinks I’m “divisive” for criticizing that, they’re just not living in factual reality anymore and that’s their malfunction, not mine.

              • Wilco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                The censure on Green was a total shit maneuver. Those dems should lose their seats. MTG sat in a weird fur coat screaming at Biden and they didn’t bat an eye.

                Democrats need to go pure anticapitalist, but they won’t because of money … Super PACs.
                At this point there is no way to get the billionaires out of government besides an uprising of some form.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      The flip side is that if the Dems shut it down, the republicans will use that as a scapegoat for all their failures and, truth be damned, their base will eat it up. It’s not an enviable position.

      • hydrashok@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re fucked for agreeing, and equally fucked amongst the same populace for disagreeing, there’s not a lot of downsides going for the “shut it down” plan.

  • immutable@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Democratic leadership is coming out swinging on this one, telling their caucus that any member of the party that attempts to block this bill will be primaried.

    In these unprecedented times it is an absolute necessity that democrats join with republicans to ensure their agenda moves forward. Americans want a congress that works again. Any member that dares to hold this great nation hostage to score cheap political points will meet with the full fury of the DNC.

    When asked if they were at all concerned about the policies they would be enabling they responded

    Our donors don’t pay us to worry about policies. We will not be held hostage by small dollar donors any longer. The only thing more dangerous to our democracy than the specter of fascism would be us breaking a single norm or polite convention.

    When told that trump recently threatened to round up democratic lawmakers and execute them for the good of the nation leadership had this to say.

    While we certainly disagree with their plans, we will hold our heads up high knowing that we had the integrity to pass the spending necessary to keep the gears of government turning.

    At that point democratic leadership had to leave with one senior leader saying “I need to get back to dialing for dollars” and another stating that they “had to pressure more members to censure Al Greene for his despicable display of barbarism, shouting out the president, is there no decency anymore”

      • immutable@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was gonna put an /s on it but I thought it was more fun to leave it ambiguous.

        The quotes are not real (except the “we won’t be held hostage by small dollar donors” is a paraphrasing of something that recently came out of some dnc think tank about what to do going forward)

      • jumperalex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You know, I had a gut reaction to your post, “If it’s in the law they have to honor it!”

        But then I remembered what timeline we’re in. The one where congress and the courts have abdicated themselves to the Executive Branch. The one where there is nothing to stop the Republicans in congress from making promises, putting them into the budget, Trump flatly denying it (aka Impoundment), and congress and the courts not pushing back.

        It can 100% happen and we have the evidence and precedent now to prove it.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely no way it’s gonna happen but the best play I could think of for this situation would be for Dems to not support it and then go on a social media tirade about how they did everything they could to stop a government shutdown. You know, do their best to make the other side look bad by slandering them with lies like how they wanted to cut all funding to public schools or something else ridiculous. Over 99% of people aren’t gonna read the damn bill anyways and will probably take what is said at face value because of not reading it, as sad as it sounds.

    Absolutely not gonna happen because the only US politician with any amount of spine I know of at this point is Bernie Sanders, but would be fun to see.

    • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      They will cuz they suck. But they shouldn’t.

      Do to chump what the Repubs did to Obama. Go full Mitch McConnell. Stop everything you can. Help with absolutely nothing.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    they’ll get it.

    Unlike the Republicans, the democrats have double digit numbers of people who will flip flop and cross the isle, even in a time like this.