• owl@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      To me the biggest problem, that AI might solve is documentation.

        • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I’ve used AI to give me a good enough guess that I know the right keywords to search for too find the real documentation.

        • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ve had pretty good experience with using AI to find what I’m looking for in documentation, especially if the docs are in context

          • SatyrSack@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think they mean having an AI read code and then write documentation for it. Not having an AI read documentation.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          How about this:
          Humans (or humans assisted by AI) write documentation
          Users (devs included) can either choose to read the manual the old fashioned way or utilize it like a sort of swagger api documentation to give

          1. Information to a question (How to do x)
          2. Provide a general example
          3. (Assuming it’s used with an IDE or has information about the project) Provide a personalized example on the implementation.