Note that I’m not necessarily opposed to her facing consequences for killing him – my issue is with how gleefully NYPost is framing it as if she just attacked him out of the blue and shoehorning her into the “evil transgenders” stereotype

        • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          And you’re just flat out incorrect

          https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PEN/35.20

          1. A person in possession or control of, or licensed or privileged to be in, a dwelling or an occupied building, who reasonably believes that another person is committing or attempting to commit a burglary of such dwelling or building, may use deadly physical force upon such other person when he or she reasonably believes such to be necessary to prevent or terminate the commission or attempted commission of such burglary.
        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is a complete fantasy. You don’t even have to ensure that they are armed they represent a fatal threat by breaking into your house with you in it you would have every right to shoot them immediately

        • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The logical explanation is you don’t know the law correctly because your “friend” at the ACLU realized a wild bisexual hothead such as yourself with a gun was a recipe for disaster, understandably. So this person lied, made up a litany of non-existant jurisprudence, and the world is safer and sexier as a result. This does not mean that actual claims of self-defence go away.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Go ask a criminal attorney if there’s a self defense claim

      If you had ever followed that advice, you wouldn’t be repeating this nonsense. You would have learned the 6 general criteria required for a self defense claim, and that none of those criteria require the defender to be less-well-armed than the attacker.

      This subject is too serious for your uninformed opinion. PM me your zip code, and I would be happy to find you a class on the laws regulating self defense.