Currently still in Nightly and only on ‘Copy Link’. Still nice progress though.

  • @Risk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    1511 year ago

    Ooh. I hope this can be set as the default for ‘Copy Link’ and then I can just have the tracking when I actually want it.

    • @navi@lemmy.tespia.org
      link
      fedilink
      461 year ago

      have the tracking when I actually want it.

      So never? I agree defaulting it would be great as long as it doesn’t falsely remove anything.

      • redfellow
        link
        fedilink
        33
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not all queryparameters are tracking, so the option to copy the actual href of the hyperlink is useful.

        Most of the time I appreciate a feature that strips them automatically

        • @gkd@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          Yea, existing extensions get things wrong sometimes. I’m sure this will be the same - especially if sites start changing things to temporarily circumvent. Needs to be an easy way to grab the real URL just in case.

  • Alien Nathan Edward
    link
    fedilink
    1181 year ago

    firefox removes tracking data

    chrome wants to make it possible for websites to refuse to serve you data if you run unapproved software

    there is, in fact, a good guy in the browser wars

    • m3t00🌎
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “refuse to serve you data”, read as, “refuse to show you ads”, yeah right

      • Alien Nathan Edward
        link
        fedilink
        181 year ago

        I would love for you to expand on what you were trying to say with this comment, in great detail. I would consider it a favor.

  • ZeroCool
    link
    fedilink
    761 year ago

    That’s awesome! I use the Clear URLs extension and it does a great job but it’ll be nice to have this capability baked in.

    • Bleeping Lobster
      link
      fedilink
      English
      561 year ago

      Had no idea something existed for this, I’m forever deleted annoying tracking info from links. Mozilla continues to impress me with their privacy additions… latest update notified me about email masking which looks like it’ll be a major boon once I work out how to use it.

      • @lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        Clear URL is great. Beware that it can break some login and payment sites though. The Addon unfortunately lacks a whitelist so you have to turn it on and off, so it’s easy to forget to turn back on.

  • @4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    611 year ago

    This may be difficult to maintain as some query parameters might be necessary. How will they be sure they’re not stripping essential elements? Won’t this become an arms race to mask tracking elements as “legitimate” looking parameters?

    Awesome if they can pull it off, though.

      • most of the time sharing utm links isn’t helpful to the origin as if you copy a link from your email it’ll have medium=email, but actually should now be medium=direct

        • @Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Anything is better than nothing. Besides, it’s still useful because you can see where the original link was copied from, and you still have the referrer header

    • Orbituary
      link
      fedilink
      281 year ago

      A uBlock style community sourced list would be a great way to address this. Once it’s in prod, an addon would be next.

    • @NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Won’t this become an arms race to mask tracking elements as “legitimate” looking parameters?

      Maybe, but only like 3% of people are using Firefox so, maybe not?

  • andrew_bidlaw
    link
    fedilink
    561 year ago

    Another fine addition would be a cut of redirecting trash. If you post some link in some soc network, it would sometimes replace it with it’s own link going through an outbound clicks tracker, safety pages ‘Do you really want to follow it?’ or just block you saying the link seems malicious.

    If I’m a 3%er, can I choose not to have it?

    • @lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Is AMP still a thing? I haven’t seen it in ages.

      I don’t use Google so maybe that’s why, but I hadn’t even seen it on Reddit or Lemmy in more than a year I believe.

      • @M137@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        I see it pretty often. But most of the time, if an “AMPutator” bot doesn’t reply, someone usually mentions it and says to stop sharing AMP links and provides links to information about it. It’s good to see, but most people still aren’t aware of it, and most of those people wouldn’t care much. We all need to keep a lookout and always be ready to inform and teach others about it. It’s good to have articles about how AMP is bad for everyone (except google) saved so we can quickly share them every time we see someone share an AMP link.

  • Bosa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    Firefox once again proving it’s the GOAT of browsers.

    I’m sure this will come to mobile soon as well.

  • This should be default, or at least a switch, that if enabled, all links copied without tracking. BTW i was thinking, isnt there a simple app or service, that does only this: listen for links in clipboard, if a link added, automatically removes tracking params, and replaces with that on clipboard?

    • KubeRoot
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      IMO this shouldn’t be default, since it messes with the link you’re copying, not only because of the potential to break.

      • @dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        So just a set of strings determined to be used for tracking among a set of hosts? It’s not like I have a better solution, but I feel like making this anti-tracking method encourages more complex tracking params. At some point, I wouldn’t be surprised to see randomly generated query parameter keys which are resolved server side, making this approach impossible.

        • e$tGyr#J2pqM8v
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I completely agree with you, but this is always the problem isn’t it? It’s a cat and mouse game. If the mouse learns techniques to hide from the cat the cat develops better techniques to find the mouse. It’s not a reason for the mouse to stop hiding.

  • @toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    13
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think I’m against this. Not because it’s the wrong thing to do, but it’s just going to swing marketers & such to obscure their tracking URLs to something like /my-slug/hashed-uid-for-tracking-without-query-param/post & it maybe unsafe or impossible to replace that part of the URL is some cases (think how not all credit cards numbers work, it has a built-in algorithm). The corpos can do this already now but query params are easier & less fiddly. Despite the large number of add-ons that could combat this already (including a uBlock Origin filter list), there wasn’t enough incentive to start another ad/tracking arms race… but you introduce it as a default feature in a major (🤞) browser, & now the corpos take notice instead of being able to wave it off as something a minority of users are doing.

    …And I say this as the guy that reminds $WORK chat poster to remove their tracking URLs for the privacy of the group