• Lemdee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 years ago

    Until we get ranked choice voting or similar the Green Party is a joke with zero chance of election. Voting for them only helps Republicans at this point in time.

      • Lemdee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 years ago

        Wrong. Dead fucking wrong. Due to our current shitty system the only parties with any chance of winning are Dems or GOP, every vote that doesn’t go to the Dems is another point the GOP has over them. If you don’t vote for Dems you’re facilitating fascism. Simple as.

        I don’t like our choices but we don’t have the option to be fucking picky right now, there’s fascists at the door and they’re working hard to ruin our lives.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Democrats, at worst, are centrist, not right wing. If you can’t comprehend basic terminology then perhaps this is not the community for you.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  if you threaten to ban people who know what fascism is and what lexicographers’ jobs are. maybe this isn’t the right community for me

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism

                  Dictionaries are often treated as the final arbiter in arguments over a word’s meaning, but they are not always well suited for settling disputes. The lexicographer’s role is to explain how words are (or have been) actually used, not how some may feel that they should be used, and they say nothing about the intrinsic nature of the thing named or described by a word, much less the significance it may have for individuals. When discussing concepts like racism, therefore, it is prudent to recognize that quoting from a dictionary is unlikely to either mollify or persuade the person with whom one is arguing.

        • timicin@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          voting for the lesser evil will only serve to guarantee that you will forever be voting for the lesser evil and that you will reach the same evil that the alternative raced towards, but slower.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            3 years ago

            Thats really poetic but observe our choices in reality in relation to the systems we built to usher them in. You don’t cut your parachute just because you’re falling anyway.

          • osarusan@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 years ago

            My god, what a stupid take.

            The lesser evil is by definition the better choice! If you refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils, you are effectively choosing the greater evil. It does not get any stupider than that.

            • Sybil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              If you refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils,

              you are choosing not to vote for evil.

                • Sybil@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  in the trolley scenario, i don’t touch the lever. you can choose to be a murderer, but i won’t.

                  • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    In the trolley scenario, you chose to let 6 people die. Neither choice makes you a murderer. But one choice causes much more harm than the other.

    • roo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      If less enthusiastic Republican voters have a chance to vote for a neutral party instead of voting for a shitshow, then how is it helping Republicans?!

      • Lemdee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 years ago

        Lol it’s not Republicans voting for the green party, the green party has only ever siphoned votes from the Democratic candidates.

          • Lemdee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            3 years ago

            The GOP is attempting to destroy democracy, the Dems are not. The GOP are trying to subjugate me as a queer/trans person and POC as well, the Dems are not. The GOP are removing human rights from us, the Dems are not. The Dems are trying to pass green energy legislation, gun control laws, and more while the GOP are blocking it.

            Those are some pretty good god damn reasons.

              • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 years ago

                So you read all of that and you could only muster an emotional response.

                I think that says all that needs to be said. You’d rather enable our democracy to be destroyed (and you know, make it harder to do anything about fascism later) and vote in a way that will make you feel a little better about yourself while it goes into the void.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 years ago

                Just trying to help:

                Neoliberalism was an attempt to save both the state and capitalism. Capitalism, however, cannot be rehabilitated. It will not save us from totalitarianism or state-sponsored genocide. Capital can absorb any product, service, or practice (including government practice) into itself and then reproduce itself. It is always primed for, always flirting with, the spectre of fascism. Source

              • probablyaCat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                Yeah see how that turns out if the republicans win next election. They facilitate fascism by being the only alternative to actual fascist politicians. They certainly aren’t perfect, but seriously how do you think it plays out if enough morons like you vote for Putin apologist Stein? What do you think the end result will be?